S M Zeng1, J Yankowitz, J A Widness, R G Strauss. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, 200 Hawkins Dr, Iowa City, IA 52242-1080, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Males have a higher hematocrit (Hct) than females. The cause of this gender-based difference is unclear. We sought to determine whether polymorphisms of the erythropoietin (EPO) gene or of its receptor (EPOR) explain this situation. METHODS: We designed primers for the EPO and EPOR genes. Previously undescribed polymorphisms were found based on band migration on polyacrylamide gel, and when then sequenced. The distribution of these polymorphisms was studied in a population of 819 non-iron-deficient, healthy blood donors. To test the gender differences, analysis was done based on groups defined by Hct levels. The chi-square statistic was used to compare the frequency differences between groups, with P < .05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: We found previously reported polymorphisms in both the EPO and EPOR genes. Sequence analysis showed that the EPO polymorphism was due to a difference in the repeat copy number of the tetranucleotide cytosine adenine cytosine thymine (CACT) at position 2153. A previously undescribed 12th allele was found for the EPOR polymorphic site. Statistical analysis showed that the EPOR alleles, EPORA1 and EPORA10, were present at a significantly higher frequency in females than in males (P = .027 and P = .041, respectively), and EPOR5 was found less frequently in females than in males (P = .048). The allelic frequency of the EPO polymorphism was not significantly different by gender or Hct groups. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that the variation of Hct level by gender may have a genetic basis. The sequence-based polymorphism for EPOR may be partly responsible for this gender-based variation in Hct level. These findings offer new clues to understanding Hct variation in the general population and to elucidating mechanisms of controlling Hct levels.
INTRODUCTION: Males have a higher hematocrit (Hct) than females. The cause of this gender-based difference is unclear. We sought to determine whether polymorphisms of the erythropoietin (EPO) gene or of its receptor (EPOR) explain this situation. METHODS: We designed primers for the EPO and EPOR genes. Previously undescribed polymorphisms were found based on band migration on polyacrylamide gel, and when then sequenced. The distribution of these polymorphisms was studied in a population of 819 non-iron-deficient, healthy blood donors. To test the gender differences, analysis was done based on groups defined by Hct levels. The chi-square statistic was used to compare the frequency differences between groups, with P < .05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: We found previously reported polymorphisms in both the EPO and EPOR genes. Sequence analysis showed that the EPO polymorphism was due to a difference in the repeat copy number of the tetranucleotide cytosine adenine cytosine thymine (CACT) at position 2153. A previously undescribed 12th allele was found for the EPOR polymorphic site. Statistical analysis showed that the EPOR alleles, EPORA1 and EPORA10, were present at a significantly higher frequency in females than in males (P = .027 and P = .041, respectively), and EPOR5 was found less frequently in females than in males (P = .048). The allelic frequency of the EPO polymorphism was not significantly different by gender or Hct groups. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that the variation of Hct level by gender may have a genetic basis. The sequence-based polymorphism for EPOR may be partly responsible for this gender-based variation in Hct level. These findings offer new clues to understanding Hct variation in the general population and to elucidating mechanisms of controlling Hct levels.
Authors: Bharat B Biswal; Maarten Mennes; Xi-Nian Zuo; Suril Gohel; Clare Kelly; Steve M Smith; Christian F Beckmann; Jonathan S Adelstein; Randy L Buckner; Stan Colcombe; Anne-Marie Dogonowski; Monique Ernst; Damien Fair; Michelle Hampson; Matthew J Hoptman; James S Hyde; Vesa J Kiviniemi; Rolf Kötter; Shi-Jiang Li; Ching-Po Lin; Mark J Lowe; Clare Mackay; David J Madden; Kristoffer H Madsen; Daniel S Margulies; Helen S Mayberg; Katie McMahon; Christopher S Monk; Stewart H Mostofsky; Bonnie J Nagel; James J Pekar; Scott J Peltier; Steven E Petersen; Valentin Riedl; Serge A R B Rombouts; Bart Rypma; Bradley L Schlaggar; Sein Schmidt; Rachael D Seidler; Greg J Siegle; Christian Sorg; Gao-Jun Teng; Juha Veijola; Arno Villringer; Martin Walter; Lihong Wang; Xu-Chu Weng; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Peter Williamson; Christian Windischberger; Yu-Feng Zang; Hong-Ying Zhang; F Xavier Castellanos; Michael P Milham Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-02-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sharna D Jamadar; Francesco Sforazzini; Parnesh Raniga; Nicholas J Ferris; Bryan Paton; Michael J Bailey; Amy Brodtmann; Paul A Yates; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephanie A Ward; Robyn L Woods; Elsdon Storey; John J McNeil; Gary F Egan Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2019-09-15 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Santhi K Ganesh; Neil A Zakai; Frank J A van Rooij; Nicole Soranzo; Albert V Smith; Michael A Nalls; Ming-Huei Chen; Anna Kottgen; Nicole L Glazer; Abbas Dehghan; Brigitte Kuhnel; Thor Aspelund; Qiong Yang; Toshiko Tanaka; Andrew Jaffe; Joshua C M Bis; Germaine C Verwoert; Alexander Teumer; Caroline S Fox; Jack M Guralnik; Georg B Ehret; Kenneth Rice; Janine F Felix; Augusto Rendon; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Daniel Levy; Kushang V Patel; Eric Boerwinkle; Jerome I Rotter; Albert Hofman; Jennifer G Sambrook; Dena G Hernandez; Gang Zheng; Stefania Bandinelli; Andrew B Singleton; Josef Coresh; Thomas Lumley; André G Uitterlinden; Janine M Vangils; Lenore J Launer; L Adrienne Cupples; Ben A Oostra; Jaap-Jan Zwaginga; Willem H Ouwehand; Swee-Lay Thein; Christa Meisinger; Panos Deloukas; Matthias Nauck; Tim D Spector; Christian Gieger; Vilmundur Gudnason; Cornelia M van Duijn; Bruce M Psaty; Luigi Ferrucci; Aravinda Chakravarti; Andreas Greinacher; Christopher J O'Donnell; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Susan Furth; Mary Cushman; Tamara B Harris; Jing-Ping Lin Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2009-10-11 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Gabriel S Gonzales-Portillo; Stephanny Reyes; Daniela Aguirre; Mibel M Pabon; Cesar V Borlongan Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2014-08-12 Impact factor: 4.003