Literature DB >> 11323431

Site-specific charge interactions of alpha-conotoxin MI with the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.

R V Papineni1, J U Sanchez, K Baksi, I U Willcockson, S E Pedersen.   

Abstract

We have tested the importance of charge interactions for alpha-conotoxin MI binding to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR). Ionic residues on alpha-conotoxin MI were altered by site-directed mutagenesis or by chemical modification. In physiological buffer, removal of charges at the N terminus, His-5, and Lys-10 had small (2-4-fold) effects on binding affinity to the mouse muscle AChR and the Torpedo AChR. It was also demonstrated that conotoxin had no effect on the conformational equilibrium of either receptor, as assessed by the effects of the noncompetitive antagonist proadifen on conotoxin binding and, conversely, the effect of conotoxin on the affinity of phencyclidine, proadifen, and ethidium. Conotoxin displayed higher binding affinity in low ionic strength buffer; neutralization of Lys-10 and the N terminus by acetylation blocked this affinity shift at the alphadelta site but not at the alphagamma site. It is concluded that Ctx residues Lys-10 and the N terminal interact with oppositely charged receptor residues only at the alphadelta site, and the two sites have distinct arrangements of charged residues. Ethidium fluorescence experiments demonstrated that conotoxin is formally competitive with a small cholinergic ligand, tetramethylammonium. Thus, alpha-conotoxin MI appears to interact with the portion of the binding site responsible for stabilizing agonist cations but does not do so with a cationic residue and is, consequently, incapable of inducing a conformational change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11323431     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M102350200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  5 in total

1.  A comparative study on selectivity of alpha-conotoxins GI and ImI using their synthetic analogues and derivatives.

Authors:  Igor E Kasheverov; Maxim N Zhmak; Innokenty V Maslennikov; Yuri N Utkin; Victor I Tsetlin
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.996

2.  Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor channel electrostatics determined by diffusion-enhanced luminescence energy transfer.

Authors:  Robert H Meltzer; Monica M Lurtz; Theodore G Wensel; Steen E Pedersen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Genetic Algorithm Managed Peptide Mutant Screening: Optimizing Peptide Ligands for Targeted Receptor Binding.

Authors:  Matthew D King; Thomas Long; Timothy Andersen; Owen M McDougal
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Structure-Function Elucidation of a New α-Conotoxin, MilIA, from Conus milneedwardsi.

Authors:  Steve Peigneur; Prabha Devi; Andrea Seldeslachts; Samuthirapandian Ravichandran; Loïc Quinton; Jan Tytgat
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 5.118

5.  The 3/4- and 3/6-Subfamily Variants of α-Conotoxins GI and MI Exhibit Potent Inhibitory Activity against Muscular Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors.

Authors:  Xiaoli Ma; Qiuyuan Huang; Shuo Yu; Shujing Xu; Yue Huang; Zhiming Zhao; Xinrong Xiao; Qiuyun Dai
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 5.118

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.