OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that the shape of the configuration of fiducial points is an important factor governing target registration error (TRE) in point-based, rigid registration. METHODS: We consider two clinical situations: cranial neurosurgery and pedicle screw placement. For cranial neurosurgery, we apply theoretical results concerning TRE prediction, which we have previously derived and validated, to three hypothetical fiducial marker configurations. We illustrate the profile of expected TRE for each configuration. For pedicle screw placement, we apply the same theory to a common anatomic landmark configuration (tips of spinous and transverse processes) used for pedicle screw placement, and we estimate the error rate expected in placement of the screw. RESULTS: In the cranial neurosurgery example, we demonstrate that relatively small values of TRE may be achieved by using widely spread fiducial markers and/or placing the centroid of the markers near the target. We also demonstrate that near-collinear marker configurations far from the target may result in large TRE values. In the pedicle screw placement example, we demonstrate that the screw must be approximately 4 mm narrower than the pedicle in which it is implanted to minimize the chance of pedicle violation during placement. CONCLUSION: The placement of fiducial points is an important factor in minimizing the error rate for point-based, rigid registration. By using as many points as possible, avoiding near-collinear configurations, and ensuring that the centroid of the fiducial points is as near as possible to the target, TREs can be minimized.
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that the shape of the configuration of fiducial points is an important factor governing target registration error (TRE) in point-based, rigid registration. METHODS: We consider two clinical situations: cranial neurosurgery and pedicle screw placement. For cranial neurosurgery, we apply theoretical results concerning TRE prediction, which we have previously derived and validated, to three hypothetical fiducial marker configurations. We illustrate the profile of expected TRE for each configuration. For pedicle screw placement, we apply the same theory to a common anatomic landmark configuration (tips of spinous and transverse processes) used for pedicle screw placement, and we estimate the error rate expected in placement of the screw. RESULTS: In the cranial neurosurgery example, we demonstrate that relatively small values of TRE may be achieved by using widely spread fiducial markers and/or placing the centroid of the markers near the target. We also demonstrate that near-collinear marker configurations far from the target may result in large TRE values. In the pedicle screw placement example, we demonstrate that the screw must be approximately 4 mm narrower than the pedicle in which it is implanted to minimize the chance of pedicle violation during placement. CONCLUSION: The placement of fiducial points is an important factor in minimizing the error rate for point-based, rigid registration. By using as many points as possible, avoiding near-collinear configurations, and ensuring that the centroid of the fiducial points is as near as possible to the target, TREs can be minimized.
Authors: Tuhin K Sinha; Benoit M Dawant; Valerie Duay; David M Cash; Robert J Weil; Reid C Thompson; Kyle D Weaver; Michael I Miga Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Mathias Seitel; Lena Maier-Hein; Alexander Seitel; Alfred M Franz; Hannes Kenngott; Raffaele De Simone; Ivo Wolf; Hans-Peter Meinzer Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2009-06-03 Impact factor: 2.924