Literature DB >> 11320166

Noninvasive carotid imaging to select patients for endarterectomy: is it really safer than conventional angiography?

J W Norris, P M Rothwell.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2001        PMID： 11320166     DOI： 10.1212/wnl.56.8.990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN： 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Utility of noninvasive studies in the evaluation of patients with carotid artery disease.

Authors:  Dean C C Johnston; Larry B Goldstein
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Measurement error of percent diameter carotid stenosis determined by conventional angiography: implications for noninvasive evaluation.

Authors:  Joseph E Heiserman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  The appropriate use of carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Henry J M Barnett; Heather E Meldrum; Michael Eliasziw
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Ultrasound and angiography in the selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Andrei V Alexandrov
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Carotid endarterectomy-the evidence.

Authors:  Jonothan J Earnshaw
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 18.000
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.