A Azoulay1, P Garzon, M J Eisenberg. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Because of growing concern that constituents of drinking water may have adverse health effects, consumption of tap water in North America has decreased and consumption of bottled water has increased. Our objectives were to 1) determine whether North American tap water contains clinically important levels of calcium (Ca2+), magnesium (Mg2+), and sodium (Na+) and 2) determine whether differences in mineral content of tap water and commercially available bottled waters are clinically important. DESIGN: We obtained mineral analysis reports from municipal water authorities of 21 major North American cities. Mineral content of tap water was compared with published data regarding commercially available bottled waters and with dietary reference intakes (DRIs). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mineral levels varied among tap water sources in North America and among bottled waters. European bottled waters generally contained higher mineral levels than North American tap water sources and North American bottled waters. For half of the tap water sources we examined, adults may fulfill between 8% and 16% of their Ca2+ DRI and between 6% and 31% of their Mg2+ DRI by drinking 2 liters per day. One liter of most moderate mineralization European bottled waters contained between 20% and 58% of the Ca2+ DRI and between 16% and 41% of the Mg2+ DRI in adults. High mineralization bottled waters often contained up to half of the maximum recommended daily intake of Na+. CONCLUSION: Drinking water sources available to North Americans may contain high levels of Ca2+, Mg2+, and Na+ and may provide clinically important portions of the recommended dietary intake of these minerals. Physicians should encourage patients to check the mineral content of their drinking water, whether tap or bottled, and choose water most appropriate for their needs.
OBJECTIVES: Because of growing concern that constituents of drinking water may have adverse health effects, consumption of tapwater in North America has decreased and consumption of bottled water has increased. Our objectives were to 1) determine whether North American tapwater contains clinically important levels of calcium (Ca2+), magnesium (Mg2+), and sodium (Na+) and 2) determine whether differences in mineral content of tapwater and commercially available bottled waters are clinically important. DESIGN: We obtained mineral analysis reports from municipal water authorities of 21 major North American cities. Mineral content of tapwater was compared with published data regarding commercially available bottled waters and with dietary reference intakes (DRIs). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mineral levels varied among tapwater sources in North America and among bottled waters. European bottled waters generally contained higher mineral levels than North American tapwater sources and North American bottled waters. For half of the tapwater sources we examined, adults may fulfill between 8% and 16% of their Ca2+ DRI and between 6% and 31% of their Mg2+ DRI by drinking 2 liters per day. One liter of most moderate mineralization European bottled waters contained between 20% and 58% of the Ca2+ DRI and between 16% and 41% of the Mg2+ DRI in adults. High mineralization bottled waters often contained up to half of the maximum recommended daily intake of Na+. CONCLUSION: Drinking water sources available to North Americans may contain high levels of Ca2+, Mg2+, and Na+ and may provide clinically important portions of the recommended dietary intake of these minerals. Physicians should encourage patients to check the mineral content of their drinking water, whether tap or bottled, and choose water most appropriate for their needs.
Authors: Cristina Palacios; G Justus Hofmeyr; Gabriela Cormick; Maria Nieves Garcia-Casal; Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas; Ana Pilar Betrán Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2020-09-18 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Lorna A Ward; Owen L Cain; Ryan A Mullally; Kathryn S Holliday; Aaron G H Wernham; Paul D Baillie; Sheila M Greenfield Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-06-19 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Simone J M Stoots; Guido M Kamphuis; Rob Geraghty; Liffert Vogt; Michaël M E L Henderickx; B M Zeeshan Hameed; Sufyan Ibrahim; Amelia Pietropaolo; Enakshee Jamnadass; Sahar M Aljumaiah; Saeed B Hamri; Eugenio Ventimiglia; Olivier Traxer; Vineet Gauhar; Etienne X Keller; Vincent De Coninck; Otas Durutovic; Nariman K Gadzhiev; Laurian B Dragos; Tarik Emre Sener; Nick Rukin; Michele Talso; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Esteban Emiliani; Ewa Bres-Niewada; Kymora B Scotland; Naeem Bhojani; Athanasios Vagionis; Angela Piccirilli; Bhaskar K Somani Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-06-27 Impact factor: 4.241