Literature DB >> 11316725

The long term outcome of limbal allografts: the search for surviving cells.

T R Henderson1, D J Coster, K A Williams.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Limbal allotransplantation is increasingly being used for ocular surface repair in patients with limbal stem cell dysfunction. However, it is uncertain whether donor cells survive long term on the ocular surface and whether patients maintain the early benefits of the procedure. The aims of this study were to investigate the long term outcome of clinical limbal allografts and to correlate outcome with donor cell survival.
METHODS: Five patients who had undergone allotransplantation-four keratolimbal allografts and one tarsoconjunctival allograft-from 3-5 years previously, and for whom residual frozen donor ocular tissue was available, were reviewed. Survival of donor cells lifted from the recipient ocular surface by impression cytology was investigated by DNA fingerprinting using primers detecting variable nucleotide tandem repeat sequences. Recipient buccal cells and scleral samples from the remnant donor eye were used to genotype recipients and donors, respectively. Polymerase chain reaction products were sized by Genescan analysis.
RESULTS: An objective long term benefit from the procedure (improved Snellen acuity, reduced frequency of epithelial defects, reduced vascularisation, and scarring) was recorded for four patients. Some subjective benefit was also reported. However, in no instances were donor cells recovered from the ocular surface at 3-5 years post-graft. Initial experiments to examine sensitivity indicated that any surviving donor cells must have constituted less than 2.5% of cells sampled.
CONCLUSION: Limbal stem cell allotransplantation can provide long term benefits, as measured by objective criteria. However, such benefits do not necessarily correlate with survival of measurable numbers of donor cells on the ocular surface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11316725      PMCID: PMC1723982          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.85.5.604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  22 in total

1.  Limbal autograft reconstruction after conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  R A Copeland; D H Char
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-10-15       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Comparison of limbal and conjunctival autograft transplantation in corneal surface reconstruction in rabbits.

Authors:  R J Tsai; T T Sun; S C Tseng
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Individual-specific 'fingerprints' of human DNA.

Authors:  A J Jeffreys; V Wilson; S L Thein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Jul 4-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  The multipotential cells of the limbus.

Authors:  R A Thoft; L A Wiley; N Sundarraj
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 5.  Corneal stem cell disease: concepts, categorization, and treatment by auto- and homotransplantation of limbal stem cells.

Authors:  R R Pfister
Journal:  CLAO J       Date:  1994-01

6.  Survival of rabbit limbal stem cell allografts after administration of cyclosporin A.

Authors:  K P Xu; Y Wu; J Zhou; X Zhang
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Limbal epithelium in ocular surface wound healing.

Authors:  S Kinoshita; T C Kiorpes; J Friend; R A Thoft
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Limbal transplantation in the management of chronic contact-lens-associated epitheliopathy.

Authors:  C Jenkins; S Tuft; C Liu; R Buckley
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Indications for keratoepithelioplasty.

Authors:  P W Turgeon; R C Nauheim; M I Roat; S S Stopak; R A Thoft
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-02

10.  Limbal autograft transplantation for ocular surface disorders.

Authors:  K R Kenyon; S C Tseng
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  12 in total

1.  Assessment of limbus and central cornea in patients with keratolimbal allograft transplantation using in vivo laser scanning confocal microscopy: an observational study.

Authors:  Jiaxu Hong; Tianyu Zheng; Jianjiang Xu; Sophie X Deng; Ling Chen; Xinghuai Sun; Qihua Le; Yimin Li
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  3D Microfabricated Scaffolds and Microfluidic Devices for Ocular Surface Replacement: a Review.

Authors:  Elisabetta Prina; Pritesh Mistry; Laura E Sidney; Jing Yang; Ricky D Wildman; Marina Bertolin; Claudia Breda; Barbara Ferrari; Vanessa Barbaro; Andrew Hopkinson; Harminder S Dua; Stefano Ferrari; Felicity R A J Rose
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.739

3.  Corneal graft rejection occurs despite Fas ligand expression and apoptosis of infiltrating cells.

Authors:  K A Williams; S D Standfield; J R Smith; D J Coster
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Late Acute Rejection After Allograft Limbal Stem Cell Transplantation: Evidence for Long-Term Donor Survival.

Authors:  Medi Eslani; Zeeshan Haq; Asadolah Movahedan; Adam Moss; Alireza Baradaran-Rafii; Gautham Mogilishetty; Edward J Holland; Ali R Djalilian
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 5.  Safety of Cultivated Limbal Epithelial Stem Cell Transplantation for Human Corneal Regeneration.

Authors:  J Behaegel; S Ní Dhubhghaill; C Koppen; N Zakaria
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 5.443

Review 6.  Limbal Stem Cell Transplantation: Clinical Results, Limits, and Perspectives.

Authors:  Marta Sacchetti; Paolo Rama; Alice Bruscolini; Alessandro Lambiase
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 5.443

7.  Short- and Long-Term Results of Xenogeneic-Free Cultivated Autologous and Allogeneic Limbal Epithelial Stem Cell Transplantations.

Authors:  Joséphine Behaegel; Nadia Zakaria; Marie-José Tassignon; Inge Leysen; Felix Bock; Carina Koppen; Sorcha Ní Dhubhghaill
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  Cell memory-based therapy.

Authors:  Seyed Hadi Anjamrooz
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 5.310

9.  Comparative Analysis of KnockOut™ Serum with Fetal Bovine Serum for the In Vitro Long-Term Culture of Human Limbal Epithelial Cells.

Authors:  Shaokun Zhang; Zaoxia Liu; Guanfang Su; Hong Wu
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Allogeneic Ex Vivo Expanded Corneal Epithelial Stem Cell Transplantation: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  John D M Campbell; Sajjad Ahmad; Ashish Agrawal; Carol Bienek; Anne Atkinson; Neil W A Mcgowan; Stephen Kaye; Sanjay Mantry; Kanna Ramaesh; Alison Glover; Jane Pelly; Coral MacRury; Margaret MacDonald; Emily Hargreaves; Jacqueline Barry; John Drain; Bruce Cuthbertson; Louis Nerurkar; Ian Downing; Alasdair R Fraser; Marc L Turner; Baljean Dhillon
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 6.940

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.