Literature DB >> 11316533

Construction and geometric stability of physiological flow rate wall-less stenosis phantoms.

K V Ramnarine1, T Anderson, P R Hoskins.   

Abstract

Wall-less flow phantoms are preferred for ultrasound (US) because tissue-mimicking material (TMM) with good acoustical properties can be made and cast to form anatomical models. The construction and geometrical stability of wall-less TMM flow phantoms is described using a novel method of sealing to prevent leakage of the blood-mimicking fluid (BMF). Wall-less stenosis flow models were constructed using a robust agar-based TMM and sealed using reticulated foam at the inlet and outlet tubes. There was no BMF leakage at the highest flow rate of 2.8 L/min in 0%, 35% and 57% diameter reduction stenoses models. Failure of the 75% stenosis model, due to TMM fracture, occurred at maximum flow rate of 2 L/min (mean velocity 10 m/s within the stenosis). No change of stenosis geometry was measured over 4 days. The construction is simple and effective and extends the possibility for high flow rate studies using robust TMM wall-less phantoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11316533     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(00)00304-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  21 in total

1.  The Resolution Integral - a tool for characterising the performance of diagnostic ultrasound scanners.

Authors:  Carmel M Moran; Scott Inglis; Stephen D Pye
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2014-02-06

2.  Detecting failed elements on phased array ultrasound transducers using the Edinburgh Pipe Phantom.

Authors:  Dan Welsh; Scott Inglis; Stephen D Pye
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2016-01-19

3.  Pipe Phantoms With Applications in Molecular Imaging and System Characterization.

Authors:  Shiying Wang; Elizabeth B Herbst; Stephen D Pye; Carmel M Moran; John A Hossack
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 4.  Criteria for the design of tissue-mimicking phantoms for the standardization of biophotonic instrumentation.

Authors:  Lina Hacker; Heidrun Wabnitz; Antonio Pifferi; T Joshua Pfefer; Brian W Pogue; Sarah E Bohndiek
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 25.671

5.  A Comparison of the Sensitivity of Contrast-Specific Imaging Modes on Clinical and Preclinical Ultrasound Scanners.

Authors:  Carmel M Moran; Charles Arthur; Emilio Quaia
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-09-15

6.  An investigation of industrial molding compounds for use in 3D ultrasound, MRI, and CT imaging phantoms.

Authors:  Bryan E Yunker; Dietmar Cordes; Ann L Scherzinger; Gerald D Dodd; Robin Shandas; Yusheng Feng; Kendall S Hunter
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Intelligent magnetic manipulation for gastrointestinal ultrasound.

Authors:  Joseph C Norton; Piotr R Slawinski; Holly S Lay; James W Martin; Benjamin F Cox; Gerard Cummins; Marc P Y Desmulliez; Richard E Clutton; Keith L Obstein; Sandy Cochran; Pietro Valdastri
Journal:  Sci Robot       Date:  2019-06-19

8.  A comparison of the imaging performance of high resolution ultrasound scanners for preclinical imaging.

Authors:  Carmel M Moran; Stephen D Pye; William Ellis; Anna Janeczko; Keith D Morris; Alan S McNeilly; Hamish M Fraser
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  The speed of sound and attenuation of an IEC agar-based tissue-mimicking material for high frequency ultrasound applications.

Authors:  Chao Sun; Stephen D Pye; Jacinta E Browne; Anna Janeczko; Bill Ellis; Mairead B Butler; Vassilis Sboros; Adrian J W Thomson; Mark P Brewin; Charles H Earnshaw; Carmel M Moran
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Tissue Doppler imaging of carotid plaque wall motion: a pilot study.

Authors:  Kumar V Ramnarine; Tim Hartshorne; Yvonne Sensier; May Naylor; Joanne Walker; A Ross Naylor; Ronney B Panerai; David H Evans
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 2.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.