Literature DB >> 11316211

Medical-legal risks of incident cancers after clearing colonoscopy.

D K Rex1, J H Bond, A D Feld.   

Abstract

Colonoscopy and polypectomy effectively reduce the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer, but some patients present with fully developed cancers within 1-4 yr of a colonoscopy that apparently cleared the colon of neoplasia. These events may result in medical-legal action against colonoscopists, generally based on an assumption of negligent technical performance of the procedure. Alternative explanations for the development of interval cancers include variable growth rates of colorectal cancers, the inherent miss rate of the procedure even when optimal examination techniques are used, and the possibility of flat lesions that are not readily detected by standard colonoscopic techniques. This paper discusses issues relevant to reduction of medical-legal risks associated with interval cancers after clearing colonoscopy. These issues include informed consent, documentation of cecal intubation, appropriate description of preparation, documentation of examination time and technique, and attention to potential atypical neoplasms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11316211     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03677.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  17 in total

1.  Fear of the Unseen.

Authors:  Brandon Sprung; Christine Granato; Danielle Marino
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Defensive medicine practices among gastroenterologists in Japan.

Authors:  Toru Hiyama; Masaharu Yoshihara; Shinji Tanaka; Yuji Urabe; Yoshihiko Ikegami; Tatsuma Fukuhara; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Bowel preparations as quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jae Young Jang; Hoon Jai Chun
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Adherence to recommended intervals for surveillance colonoscopy in average-risk patients with 1 to 2 small (<1 cm) polyps on screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Stacy B Menees; Eric Elliott; Shail Govani; Constantinos Anastassiades; Philip Schoenfeld
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  Quality Assurance in Endoscopy: Which Parameters?

Authors:  Ulrike W Denzer
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2016-01-29

6.  The inulin hydrogen breath test predicts the quality of colonic preparation.

Authors:  Donato F Altomare; Leonilde Bonfrate; Marcin Krawczyk; Frank Lammert; Onofrio Caputi-Jambrenghi; Salvatore Rizzi; Michele Vacca; Piero Portincasa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Outcome of EMR as an alternative to surgery in patients with complex colon polyps.

Authors:  Gottumukkala S Raju; Phillip J Lum; William A Ross; Selvi Thirumurthi; Ethan Miller; Patrick M Lynch; Jeffrey H Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; Mehnaz A Shafi; Brian R Weston; Mala Pande; Robert S Bresalier; Asif Rashid; Lopa Mishra; Marta L Davila; John R Stroehlein
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 8.  Interval cancers after colonoscopy-insights and recommendations.

Authors:  Silvia Sanduleanu; Ad M Masclee; Gerrit A Meijer
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 46.802

9.  The impact of bowel cleansing on follow-up recommendations in average-risk patients with a normal colonoscopy.

Authors:  Stacy B Menees; Eric Elliott; Shail Govani; Constantinos Anastassiades; Stephanie Judd; Annette Urganus; Suzanna Boyce; Philip Schoenfeld
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 10.  Interval colorectal cancers: what and why.

Authors:  Chantal M C le Clercq; Silvia Sanduleanu
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2014-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.