Literature DB >> 11316086

Inspection of lead aprons: criteria for rejection.

K Lambert1, T McKeon.   

Abstract

Lead aprons utilized by personnel performing fluoroscopy are routinely inspected for damage to comply with the requirements of hospital accrediting organizations. Fluoroscopic or radiographic examination of lead aprons may reveal imperfections ranging from small pinholes to large tears. Currently, there are no standards establishing a criteria for acceptance or rejection of lead aprons. As a consequence, many facilities have established arbitrary rejection criteria. Often lead aprons are discarded due to small imperfections, a practice that can become costly to these institutions. We have calculated increases in doses to the whole body for varying sizes of holes, including special consideration of the effects on effective dose equivalent when the hole is over the testes and thyroid. ALARA standards for cost per personsievert averted are used to establish a rational basis for criteria of acceptance or rejection of lead aprons.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11316086     DOI: 10.1097/00004032-200105001-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  6 in total

1.  Protective aprons in imaging departments: manufacturer stated lead equivalence values require validation.

Authors:  M Finnerty; P C Brennan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-03-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Radiation protection and standardization.

Authors:  O P Lakhwani; Vipin Dalal; Mohit Jindal; Ashok Nagala
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-08-07

3.  Quality Assurance of Personal Radiation Shield for Kilovoltage Photon: A Multicentre Experience.

Authors:  Omemh Bawazeer
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-03-24

Review 4.  Get Protected! Recommendations for Staff in IR.

Authors:  Gabriel Bartal; Eliseo Vano; Graciano Paulo
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Microbial Contamination Risk and Disinfection of Radiation Protective Garments.

Authors:  Stephen Balter; Michelle A Rodriguez; Janett A Pike; Norman J Kleiman
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.922

6.  A simple quality control tool for assessing integrity of lead equivalent aprons.

Authors:  Roshan S Livingstone; Anna Varghese
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.