Literature DB >> 11315777

The economic cost of hip fractures among elderly women. A one-year, prospective, observational cohort study with matched-pair analysis. Belgian Hip Fracture Study Group.

P Haentjens1, P Autier, M Barette, S Boonen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We conducted a prospective study to assess the costs of initial hospitalization for a first hip fracture and to evaluate the excess costs attributable to the hip fracture during the one-year period following hospital discharge.
METHODS: This investigation was designed as a one-year prospective cohort study with matched-pair analysis. Elderly women who were receiving care for a first hip fracture at four Belgian hospitals were matched, with respect to age and residence, with women (control subjects) with no history of hip fracture who lived in the same neighborhood. The initial hospitalization costs were tabulated from the hospital invoices. To estimate the costs during the year after hospital discharge, health-care services utilized by the hip-fracture patients and by the control subjects were recorded. We used the official reimbursement rates to assign a cost to these services, and the results are reported in United States dollars.
RESULTS: The mean age of the 159 patients who had a hip fracture was 79.3 years, and that of the 159 control subjects was 78.7 years. The total mean cost of the initial hospitalization was $9534 for the hip-fracture patients. The total direct costs during the year after discharge averaged $13,470 for the hip-fracture patients and $6170 for the control subjects. Thus, the excess direct cost during the one-year period following hospital discharge averaged $7300 for the hip-fracture patients. The largest cost differences were attributable to nursing-home stays (31%), rehabilitation-center stays (31%), hospitalizations (16%), and home physical-therapy services (14%). Two-fifths of the excess costs were spent during the three months following hospital discharge. Moreover, we observed a shift in resource utilization after hospital discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: Our one-year prospective study demonstrated that the costs of treating a hip-fracture patient are about three times greater than those of caring for a patient without a fracture. This study also highlights the savings to society if a hip fracture can be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11315777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  50 in total

Review 1.  Best practices for elderly hip fracture patients. A systematic overview of the evidence.

Authors:  Lauren A Beaupre; C Allyson Jones; L Duncan Saunders; D William C Johnston; Jeanette Buckingham; Sumit R Majumdar
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Cochrane in CORR®: Arthroplasties (with and without bone cement) for proximal femoral fractures in adults.

Authors:  Nathan Evaniew; Kim Madden; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Association between global biomarkers of oxidative stress and hip fracture in postmenopausal women: a prospective study.

Authors:  Shuman Yang; Diane Feskanich; Walter C Willett; A Heather Eliassen; Tianying Wu
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Inpatient cost for hip fracture patients managed with an orthogeriatric care model in Singapore.

Authors:  Lester Teong Jin Tan; Seng Joung Wong; Ernest Beng Kee Kwek
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 5.  Risk of hip fracture following stroke, a meta-analysis of 13 cohort studies.

Authors:  Z-C Yuan; H Mo; J Guan; J-L He; Z-J Wu
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  The Economic Burden of Femoral Neck Fractures in Jamaica.

Authors:  K D Vaughan; C Gordon; G Ducasse; S Williams
Journal:  West Indian Med J       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 0.171

7.  Costs and quality of life associated with osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden.

Authors:  Fredrik Borgström; Niklas Zethraeus; Olof Johnell; Lars Lidgren; Sari Ponzer; Olle Svensson; Peter Abdon; Ewald Ornstein; Karl Lunsjö; Karl Göran Thorngren; Ingemar Sernbo; Clas Rehnberg; Bengt Jönsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Nonoperative versus prophylactic treatment of bisphosphonate-associated femoral stress fractures.

Authors:  Michael B Banffy; Mark S Vrahas; John E Ready; John A Abraham
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  External validation of the discharge of hip fracture patients score.

Authors:  Anne J H Vochteloo; Elvira R Flikweert; Wim E Tuinebreijer; Andrea B Maier; Rolf M Bloem; Peter Pilot; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  How good is the orthopaedic literature?

Authors:  Harman Chaudhry; Raman Mundi; Ishu Singh; Thomas A Einhorn; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.