Literature DB >> 1131479

Handedness and controlled movement.

K Flowers.   

Abstract

Subjects classified according to degree of hand perference were tested with both hands on two tasks of controlled movement. Strongly lateralized subjects (both left- and right-handers) showed greater skill with their better hand than ambilaterals on a visually controlled aiming test (faster speed and equal errors), but there was no marked differences between groups with the other hand. Between-hand differences were also greater in lateralized subjects. On a ballistic rhythmical tapping test, no marked differences in speed were found, but ambilaterals made slightly fewer errors with the better hand. It is argued (i) that for ballistic movements the hands are equipotential, and skill is a direct function of practice, (ii) that the essential dexterity difference between the preferred and non-preferred hands is in the sensory or feedback control of movements rather than in motor function per se, and (iii) ambilaterals, especially those with very mixed preferences, have virtually two non-preferred hands in continuously controlled movement tasks, and may therefore reply on ballistic movements more than do pronounced sinistrals and dextrals.

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1131479     DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01438.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  35 in total

1.  Interlimb differences in control of movement extent.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Sydney Y Schaefer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  An investigation into manual asymmetries in grasp behavior and kinematics during an object manipulation task.

Authors:  Christian Seegelke; Charmayne M L Hughes; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The cost of moving with the left hand.

Authors:  Jonathan Vaughan; Deborah A Barany; Tristan Rios
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Eye-hand coordination of symmetric bimanual reaching tasks: temporal aspects.

Authors:  Divya Srinivasan; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Upper limb asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Colleen A Lewis; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Control of the dominant and nondominant hand: exploitation and taming of nonmuscular forces.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Task-dependent asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback for goal-directed movement.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  How the development of handedness could contribute to the development of language.

Authors:  George F Michel; Iryna Babik; Eliza L Nelson; Julie M Campbell; Emily C Marcinowski
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.038

9.  Motor asymmetry in elite fencers.

Authors:  Selcuk Akpinar; Robert L Sainburg; Sadettin Kirazci; Andrzej Przybyla
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 1.328

10.  Interlimb differences in coordination of rapid wrist/forearm movements.

Authors:  Gautum A Srinivasan; Tarika Embar; Robert Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.