Literature DB >> 11314629

Rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis: latency, rate, and rhythm determine the adaptive response.

M F Paccione1, B J Mehrara, S M Warren, J A Greenwald, J A Spector, J S Luchs, M T Longaker.   

Abstract

Distraction osteogenesis is a well-established technique of endogenous tissue engineering. The biomechanical factors thought to affect the quality of the distraction regenerate include the latency, rate, rhythm, and consolidation period. In an effort to understand the impact of these parameters on regenerate bone formation, this study was designed to decipher the most adaptive response in a rat model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Ninety-six adult Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 16 subgroups (n = 6 per subgroup) based on variations in the distraction parameters (i.e., latency, rate, and rhythm). After a 28-day consolidation period, the mandibles were harvested, decalcified, and sectioned. A standardized histologic ranking system was used to evaluate the effect of each protocol on the adaptive response of the regenerate bone. In this study, we have demonstrated that the latency period dramatically affects the success of distraction osteogenesis. Furthermore, distraction rates up to 0.50 mm per day stimulated excellent regenerate bone formation, whereas greater distraction rates produced a fibrous union. Finally, higher frequency distraction (i.e., increased rhythm) appeared to accelerate regenerate bone formation. We believe that defining the critical parameters of this model will improve future analysis of gene expression during rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis and may facilitate the development of biologically based strategies designed to enhance regenerate bone formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11314629     DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200103000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  8 in total

1.  Deferoxamine reverses radiation induced hypovascularity during bone regeneration and repair in the murine mandible.

Authors:  Aaron S Farberg; Xi L Jing; Laura A Monson; Alexis Donneys; Catherine N Tchanque-Fossuo; Sagar S Deshpande; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Masticatory mechanics of a mandibular distraction osteogenesis site: interfragmentary micromovement.

Authors:  Zongyang Sun; Katherine L Rafferty; Mark A Egbert; Susan W Herring
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  Bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Lisa R Amir; Vincent Everts; Antonius L J J Bronckers
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 2.634

4.  The effect of periosteal injury and masticatory micromovement on the healing of a mandibular distraction osteogenesis site.

Authors:  Zongyang Sun; Susan W Herring
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 2.633

Review 5.  Mechanotransduction of bone cells in vitro: mechanobiology of bone tissue.

Authors:  M Mullender; A J El Haj; Y Yang; M A van Duin; E H Burger; J Klein-Nulend
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  The effect of latency on bone lengthening force and bone mineralization: an investigation using strain gauge mounted on internal distractor device.

Authors:  Sekou Singare; Dichen Li; Yaxiong Liu; Zhongying Wu; Jue Wang
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  External versus Internal Distraction Devices in Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Craniofacial Anomalies.

Authors:  Adi Rachmiel; Saleh Nseir; Omri Emodi; Dror Aizenbud
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-08-07

8.  Treatment of Micrognathia by Intraoral Distraction Osteogenesis: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  M Baskaran; S Gidean Arularasan; T K Divakar; Rohini Thirunavukkarasu
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017 Jan-Jun
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.