Literature DB >> 11314212

Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of anesthesia and patient preference using the needle-less jet syringe in pediatric dental practice.

A K Munshi1, A Hegde, N Bashir.   

Abstract

Most dentists are aware that local anesthetic injections produce the highest incidence of disruptive behavior in children. Both psychological and physiological monitoring of the response of children to dental injection, support empirical observations of clinicians. The needle-free injector delivers local anesthesia without the use of a needle. This is accomplished by delivering the anesthetic solution under high compressive forces. One hundred children between the ages of 3 to 13 years underwent operative procedures using Madajet XL. There was a statistically significant difference in favor of the instrument. The instrument was completely successful in providing anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11314212     DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.25.2.q6426p853266q575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pediatr Dent        ISSN: 1053-4628            Impact factor:   1.065


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of acceptance, preference, and efficacy between jet injection INJEX and local infiltration anesthesia in 6 to 11 year old dental patients.

Authors:  Konstantinos Nikolaos Arapostathis; Nikolaos Nestoras Dabarakis; Trilby Coolidge; Anastasios Tsirlis; Nikolaos Kotsanos
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2010

2.  Comparative evaluation of efficacy of EMLA and needleless jet anesthesia in non-surgical periodontal therapy.

Authors:  Rajan Gupta; Satwinder Kaur; Parveen Dahiya; Mukesh Kumar
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2018-04-30

3.  Insight to Newer Agents and Methods for Local Anesthesia in Pediatric Dentistry.

Authors:  Vijay Prakash Mathur; Gauri Kalra
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 1.967

4.  Jet or conventional local anaesthesia? A randomized controlled split mouth study.

Authors:  Apostolina Theocharidou; Aristidis Arhakis; Nikolaos Kotsanos; Konstantinos Arapostathis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Comparison of Jet Injection Technique with Conventional Injection Technique in Patients Undergoing Endodontic Therapy.

Authors:  Mahaboob Shahul Hameed; Senthil Kumar; C Charanya; M Muthalagu; M Anitha
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2021-03-20

6.  Comparative evaluation of pain perception with a new needle-free system and dental needle method in children: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Halenur Altan; Melek Belevcikli; Alem Coşgun; Osman Demir
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.217

7.  Comparison of acceptance, preference and efficacy between pressure anesthesia and classical needle infiltration anesthesia for dental restorative procedures in adult patients.

Authors:  Chetana Sachin Makade; Pratima R Shenoi; Mohit K Gunwal
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2014-03

Review 8.  A brief review on the efficacy of different possible and nonpharmacological techniques in eliminating discomfort of local anesthesia injection during dental procedures.

Authors:  Amin Davoudi; Mansour Rismanchian; Ali Akhavan; Saeid Nosouhian; Farshad Bajoghli; Abbas Haghighat; Farahnaz Arbabzadeh; Pouran Samimi; Atiyeh Fiez; Elham Shadmehr; Kasra Tabari; Sanaz Jahadi
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2016 Jan-Apr

9.  A Needle-Free Injection System (INJEX™) with lidocaine for epidural needle insertion: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Muhammet Gozdemir; Ruveyda Irem Demircioglu; Safinaz Karabayirli; Huseyin Sert; Bunyamin Muslu; Burhanettin Usta; Ummugulsum Yazici
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.088

Review 10.  Alternative practices of achieving anaesthesia for dental procedures: a review.

Authors:  Zavattini Angelo; Charalambous Polyvios
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2018-04-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.