Literature DB >> 11311633

Analysis of postoperative glare and intraocular lens design.

J C Erie1, M H Bandhauer, J W McLaren.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the potential for reflected glare images from commonly used intraocular lens (IOL) materials and designs.
SETTING: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
METHODS: The interaction of reflected light rays from 3 commonly used IOLs (Bausch & Lomb LI61U and P359UV; Alcon AcrySof(R) MA60BM) with different optic designs (equi-biconvex: 10.0 and 15.0 mm anterior radius of curvature; unequal biconvex: 32.0 mm anterior radius of curvature) and optic materials (silicone, poly[methyl methacrylate], and acrylic) were examined in an eye model using the Zemax optical design program. The potential of each IOL model to produce subjective glare was determined from the size of the defocused reflected glare image at the retina.
RESULTS: The unequal biconvex design concentrated reflected light on a retinal area that was 60-fold smaller than that of the equi-biconvex design. Increasing the refractive index of the IOL material from 1.43 (silicone) to 1.55 (acrylic) increased the amount of reflected light 5-fold. Compared to an equi-biconvex design composed of a lower refractive index material, the unequal biconvex design with a higher refractive index material increased the relative intensity of reflected light at the retina 300-fold, and for eyes with low corneal power the intensity increased 3500-fold. Similarly, for external glare apparent to an outside observer, the intensity of reflected light increased 400-fold and for low corneal power it increased 6000-fold.
CONCLUSION: An unequal biconvex IOL design (32.0 mm anterior radius of curvature) composed of a higher refractive index material increased the potential for postoperative glare and external reflections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11311633     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00781-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  8 in total

1.  Single versus three piece acrylic IOLs.

Authors:  D F Chang
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Comparison of pseudophakic retinal straylight in spherical/aspherical and hydrophobic/hydrophilic intraocular lens.

Authors:  Yong Tang; Hui Song; Jing Chen; Xin Tang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Higher order aberration comparison between two aspherical intraocular lenses: MC6125AS and Akreos advanced optics.

Authors:  Mohammad Taher Rajabi; Sara Korouji; Mahgol Farjadnia; Mohammad Naderan; Mohammad Bagher Rajabi; Bahram Khosravi; Seyed Mehdi Tabatabaie
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  A novel gatifloxacin-loaded intraocular lens for prophylaxis of postoperative endophthalmitis.

Authors:  Mengna Li; Jing-Wei Xu; Jiayong Li; Wei Wang; Chenqi Luo; Haijie Han; Zhi-Kang Xu; Ke Yao
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-06-02

5.  Softec HD hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens: biocompatibility and precision.

Authors:  Ladan Espandar; Shameema Sikder; Majid Moshirfar
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-10

6.  Contrast sensitivity and spherical aberration in eyes implanted with AcrySof IQ and AcrySof Natural intraocular lens: the results of a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jianping Liu; Jiangyue Zhao; Liwei Ma; Guangcong Liu; Di Wu; Jinsong Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Refractive index and its impact on pseudophakic dysphotopsia.

Authors:  Bryce R Radmall; Anne Floyd; Zack Oakey; Randall J Olson
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-20

Review 8.  Effect of Intraocular Lens Tilt and Decentration on Visual Acuity, Dysphotopsia and Wavefront Aberrations.

Authors:  Zahra Ashena; Sundas Maqsood; Syed Naqib Ahmed; Mayank A Nanavaty
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.