Literature DB >> 11311195

A comparison of human dental plaque microcosm biofilms grown in an undefined medium and a chemically defined artificial saliva.

L Wong1, C Sissons, C H Sissions.   

Abstract

The growth and pathogenic properties of dental plaque result from interactions between the microbiota and the oral environment and have been studied in laboratory experimental systems ranging from single or a few species (such as in chemostats) to dental plaque microcosms. Microcosm plaque is an in vitro version of natural plaque and has been explored as a microflora model because it is sited a more manipulable and controllable environment. It is obtained as microcosm biofilms in an 'artificial mouth' plaque culture system by culturing the bacteria in natural plaque-enriched saliva (i.e. salivary bacteria where a whole-saliva donor has abstained from oral hygiene for 24 h to increase the plaque bacteria in the saliva). The aim here was to examine whether a new, chemically defined analogue of saliva (defined medium mucin, DMM) could substitute for a previously used, chemically undefined medium (basal medium mucin, BMM) as an analogue of saliva for large-scale biofilm culturing. DMM contains various ions, mucin, amino acids, vitamins and growth factors at concentrations generally similar to those in saliva, whereas BMM contains yeast extract, peptones and mucin. To model the nutrient functions of salivary proteins, amino acids equivalent to 5 g/l casein were also included in DMM. In earlier studies, BMM-grown plaques were similar to natural plaques in structure, composition, growth rate and pH response to substrates. Their doubling-time patterns over a 20-day period were similar, except that the DMM-grown plaques showed biphasic growth patterns that were more pronounced than with BMM. Variation in enzyme profiles between BMM- and DMM-grown plaque, measured using the API-ZYM technique, provided evidence of nutritional effects on plaque composition. It was concluded that realistic growth rates and patterns are generated in microcosm plaque biofilms by supplying both DMM and BMM. However, the use of DMM enables specific modifications to be made to nutrient conditions during large-scale culture in our 'artificial mouth' biofilm system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11311195     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9969(01)00016-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Oral Biol        ISSN: 0003-9969            Impact factor:   2.633


  48 in total

1.  Application of carbon source utilization patterns to measure the metabolic similarity of complex dental plaque biofilm microcosms.

Authors:  Sally A Anderson; Christopher H Sissons; Megan J Coleman; Lisa Wong
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Survival of meningococci outside of the host: implications for acquisition.

Authors:  C L Swain; D R Martin
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 2.451

3.  Biofilm community diversity after exposure to 0·4% stannous fluoride gels.

Authors:  C Reilly; K Rasmussen; T Selberg; J Stevens; R S Jones
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.772

4.  A biofilm cariogenic challenge model for dentin demineralization and dentin bonding analysis.

Authors:  Tamires T Maske; Cristina P Isolan; Françoise H van de Sande; Aline C Peixoto; André L Faria-E-Silva; Maximiliano S Cenci; Rafael R Moraes
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  A high-throughput microfluidic dental plaque biofilm system to visualize and quantify the effect of antimicrobials.

Authors:  William C Nance; Scot E Dowd; Derek Samarian; Jeffrey Chludzinski; Joseph Delli; John Battista; Alexander H Rickard
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Anaerobic growth of Candida albicans does not support biofilm formation under similar conditions used for aerobic biofilm.

Authors:  Swarajit K Biswas; W LaJean Chaffin
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2005-06-27       Impact factor: 2.188

7.  Restoration materials and secondary caries using an in vitro biofilm model.

Authors:  N K Kuper; F H van de Sande; N J M Opdam; E M Bronkhorst; J J de Soet; M S Cenci; M C D J N M Huysmans
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  Interaction between the Oral Microbiome and Dental Composite Biomaterials: Where We Are and Where We Should Go.

Authors:  J Kreth; J Merritt; C S Pfeifer; S Khajotia; J L Ferracane
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.116

9.  Comparative transcript profiling of Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis identifies SFL2, a C. albicans gene required for virulence in a reconstituted epithelial infection model.

Authors:  Martin J Spiering; Gary P Moran; Murielle Chauvel; Donna M Maccallum; Judy Higgins; Karsten Hokamp; Tim Yeomans; Christophe d'Enfert; David C Coleman; Derek J Sullivan
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2009-12-18

10.  Stability and resilience of oral microcosms toward acidification and Candida outgrowth by arginine supplementation.

Authors:  Jessica E Koopman; Wilfred F M Röling; Mark J Buijs; Christopher H Sissons; Jacob M ten Cate; Bart J F Keijser; Wim Crielaard; Egija Zaura
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 4.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.