Literature DB >> 11310946

Measuring patients' medical care preferences: care seeking versus self-treating.

J M Ganther1, J B Wiederholt, D H Kreling.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were (1) to develop a scale to measure patient preferences for using medical care, (2) to assess the reliability and validity of the scale, and (3) to examine factors predicting preferences. Preferences were defined along a continuum, anchored by self-treating preferences and care-seeking preferences. A 9-item scale was developed and mailed to a random sample of 3500 Wisconsin consumers age 50 and older. Ordinary least squares regression was used to examine whether preferences were predicted by demographic and health status variables. A 56.9% usable response rate was obtained. The Medical Care Preference Scale was unidimensional and had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.879. Younger individuals, women, individuals in better health, and individuals from rural areas had significantly stronger self-treating preferences. Significant correlations between the preference scale and 2 measures of health care utlization provided evidence of predictive validity. Individuals with care-seeking preferences used an average of 1.98 more prescription drugs and had 0.50 more physician visits in the past month than individuals with self-treating preferences. The Medical Care Preference Scale should be a useful tool for research on health care utilization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11310946     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0102100206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  7 in total

1.  Gender and health lifestyle: an in-depth exploration of self-care activities in later life.

Authors:  Joseph G Grzywacz; Eleanor Palo Stoller; A Nichol Brewer-Lowry; Ronny A Bell; Sara A Quandt; Thomas A Arcury
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2011-06-01

2.  Individual differences in aversion to ambiguity regarding medical tests and treatments: association with cancer screening cognitions.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Andrew E Williams; Amy Haskins; Caitlin Gutheil; F Lee Lucas; William M P Klein; Kathleen M Mazor
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Patient treatment preferences for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Liana Fraenkel; Barbara Gulanski; Dick Wittink
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2006-10-15

4.  Preference for hip protectors among older adults at high risk for osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Liana Fraenkel; Barbara Gulanski; Dick R Wittink
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  Patient weighting of osteoporosis medication attributes across racial and ethnic groups: a study of osteoporosis medication preferences using conjoint analysis.

Authors:  S Silverman; A Calderon; K Kaw; T B Childers; B A Stafford; W Brynildsen; A Focil; M Koenig; D T Gold
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Symptom-monitoring behaviors of rural cancer patients and survivors.

Authors:  Carol J Hermansen-Kobulnicky
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  A pilot project examining the predicted preferences of patients and physicians in the primary prophylaxis of variceal hemorrhage.

Authors:  Anna V Longacre; Avlin Imaeda; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao; Liana Fraenkel
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 17.425

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.