Literature DB >> 11310913

Initial evaluation of a continuous speech recognition program for radiology.

K M Kanal1, N J Hangiandreou, A M Sykes, H E Eklund, P A Araoz, J A Leon, B J Erickson.   

Abstract

The aims of this work were to measure the accuracy of one continuous speech recognition product and dependence on the speaker's gender and status as a native or nonnative English speaker, and evaluate the product's potential for routine use in transcribing radiology reports. IBM MedSpeak/Radiology software, version 1.1 was evaluated by 6 speakers. Two were nonnative English speakers, and 3 were men. Each speaker dictated a set of 12 reports. The reports included neurologic and body imaging examinations performed with 6 different modalities. The dictated and original report texts were compared, and error rates for overall, significant, and subtle significant errors were computed. Error rate dependence on modality, native English speaker status, and gender were evaluated by performing ttests. The overall error rate was 10.3 +/- 3.3%. No difference in accuracy between men and women was found; however, significant differences were seen for overall and significant errors when comparing native and nonnative English speakers (P = .009 and P = .008, respectively). The speech recognition software is approximately 90% accurate, and while practical implementation issues (rather than accuracy) currently limit routine use of this product throughout a radiology practice, application in niche areas such as the emergency room currently is being pursued. This methodology provides a convenient way to compare the initial accuracy of different speech recognition products, and changes in accuracy over time, in a detailed and sensitive manner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11310913      PMCID: PMC3489193          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-001-0022-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  10 in total

Review 1.  Speech recognition implementation in radiology.

Authors:  Keith S White
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2005-05-18

Review 2.  [Speech recognition: impact on workflow and report availability].

Authors:  C Glaser; C Trumm; S Nissen-Meyer; M Francke; B Küttner; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Incidence of speech recognition errors in the emergency department.

Authors:  Foster R Goss; Li Zhou; Scott G Weiner
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 4.046

4.  Comparing Preliminary and Final Neuroradiology Reports: What Factors Determine the Differences?

Authors:  K Stankiewicz; M Cohen; M Carone; G Sevinc; P G Nagy; J S Lewin; D M Yousem; L S Babiarz
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Risks and benefits of speech recognition for clinical documentation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tobias Hodgson; Enrico Coiera
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 6.  A systematic review of speech recognition technology in health care.

Authors:  Maree Johnson; Samuel Lapkin; Vanessa Long; Paula Sanchez; Hanna Suominen; Jim Basilakis; Linda Dawson
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Evaluation and comparison of errors on nursing notes created by online and offline speech recognition technology and handwritten: an interventional study.

Authors:  Sahar Peivandi; Leila Ahmadian; Jamileh Farokhzadian; Yunes Jahani
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 8.  The effectiveness of service delivery initiatives at improving patients' waiting times in clinical radiology departments: a systematic review.

Authors:  B Olisemeke; Y F Chen; K Hemming; A Girling
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Performance of an Estonian Speech Recognition System for Radiology: Effects of Different Acoustic and Language Models.

Authors:  A Paats; T Alumäe; E Meister; I Fridolin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Analysis of Errors in Dictated Clinical Documents Assisted by Speech Recognition Software and Professional Transcriptionists.

Authors:  Li Zhou; Suzanne V Blackley; Leigh Kowalski; Raymond Doan; Warren W Acker; Adam B Landman; Evgeni Kontrient; David Mack; Marie Meteer; David W Bates; Foster R Goss
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-07-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.