Literature DB >> 11310784

Finite element analysis of the current-density and electric field generated by metal microelectrodes.

C C McIntyre1, W M Grill.   

Abstract

Electrical stimulation via implanted microelectrodes permits excitation of small, highly localized populations of neurons, and allows access to features of neuronal organization that are not accessible with larger electrodes implanted on the surface of the brain or spinal cord. As a result there are a wide range of potential applications for the use of microelectrodes in neural engineering. However, little is known about the current-density and electric field generated by microelectrodes. The objectives of this project were to answer three fundamental questions regarding electrical stimulation with metal microelectrodes using geometrically and electrically accurate finite elements models. First, what is the spatial distribution of the current density over the surface of the electrode? Second, how do alterations in the electrode geometry effect neural excitation? Third, under what conditions can an electrode of finite size be modeled as a point source? Analysis of the models showed that the current density was concentrated at the tip of the microelectrode and at the electrode-insulation interface. Changing the surface area of the electrode, radius of curvature of the electrode tip, or applying a resistive coating to the electrode surface altered the current-density distribution on the surface of the electrode. Changes in the electrode geometry had little effect on neural excitation patterns, and modeling the electric field generated by sharply tipped microelectrodes using a theoretical point source was valid for distances > approximately 50 microm from the electrode tip. The results of this study suggest that a nearly uniform current-density distribution along the surface of the electrode can be achieved using a relatively large surface area electrode (500-1000 microm2), with a relatively blunt tip (3-6 microm radius of curvature), in combination with a thin (approximately 1 microm) moderately resistive coating (approximately 50 omega m).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11310784     DOI: 10.1114/1.1352640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  37 in total

1.  Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation: an intracellular study in rat thalamus.

Authors:  Trent Anderson; Bin Hu; Quentin Pittman; Zelma H T Kiss
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-06-24       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Model-based Vestibular Afferent Stimulation: Modular Workflow for Analyzing Stimulation Scenarios in Patient Specific and Statistical Vestibular Anatomy.

Authors:  Michael Handler; Peter P Schier; Karl D Fritscher; Patrik Raudaschl; Lejo Johnson Chacko; Rudolf Glueckert; Rami Saba; Rainer Schubert; Daniel Baumgarten; Christian Baumgartner
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Tissue and electrode capacitance reduce neural activation volumes during deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Christopher R Butson; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Finite element analysis of a floating microstimulator.

Authors:  Mesut Sahin; Syed S Ur-Rahman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Axonal sodium-channel bands shape the response to electric stimulation in retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Shelley I Fried; Aaron C W Lasker; Neal J Desai; Donald K Eddington; Joseph F Rizzo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The "mirror" estimate: an intuitive predictor of membrane polarization during extracellular stimulation.

Authors:  Sébastien Joucla; Blaise Yvert
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Comparison of spinal cord stimulation profiles from intra- and extradural electrode arrangements by finite element modelling.

Authors:  Qiujun Huang; Hiroyuki Oya; Oliver E Flouty; Chandan G Reddy; Matthew A Howard; George T Gillies; Marcel Utz
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  High γ power in ECoG reflects cortical electrical stimulation effects on unit activity in layers V/VI.

Authors:  Azadeh Yazdan-Shahmorad; Daryl R Kipke; Mark J Lehmkuhle
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Form-function relations in cone-tipped stimulating microelectrodes.

Authors:  Steve Yaeli; Einat Binyamin; Shy Shoham
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2009-08-05

10.  A finite element model of electrode placement during stimulus evoked electromyographic monitoring of iliosacral screw insertion.

Authors:  M A Kopec; B R Moed; D W Barnett
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2008-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.