Literature DB >> 11309341

S-phase fraction and DNA ploidy in 633 T1T2 breast cancers: a standardized flow cytometric study.

A Chassevent1, M L Jourdan, S Romain, F Descotes, M Colonna, P M Martin, M Bolla, F Spyratos.   

Abstract

The lack of a standardized methodology for quantifying DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction (SPF) by flow cytometry is hindering routine use of these markers in breast cancer management. In a retrospective clinical multicenter study, we validated a standardized flow cytometry protocol. We tested 633 frozen T(1)T(2), N(0)N(1), M(0) breast tumors obtained in four institutions. Cell preparation was standardized, and precise rules for data interpretation were followed. Three SPF classes were defined on the basis of tertiles after adjustment for ploidy. DNA aneuploidy was observed in 61.0% of cases. No significant difference was observed among centers. Aneuploidy and high SPF were associated with large tumor size, node involvement, high histological grade, and hormone receptor negativity. In the overall population (median follow-up, 69 months), patients with medium and high SPF values had shorter disease-free survival (DFS) than those with low SPF values (P < 0.0001). Ploidy had no significant influence. By Cox analysis, SPF, pN, and estrogen receptor status were independent predictors of DFS (P = 0.0002, P = 0.001, and P = 0.05). In node-negative patients, SPF was the only predictor of DFS (P = 0.01), whereas in node-positive patients, the risk of relapse increased with both high SPF (P = 0.003) and estrogen receptor negativity (P = 0.004). Low SPF values distinguished grade II tumors with a particularly good outcome. Our results strongly support the use of SPF in multicenter studies and clinical trials and suggest that node-negative patients with slowly proliferating tumors do not require systemic adjuvant therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11309341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  15 in total

1.  Prognostic relevance of DNA flow cytometry in breast cancer revisited: The 25-year experience of the Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon.

Authors:  António E Pinto; Teresa Pereira; Giovani L Silva; Saudade André
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  MYCN-non-amplified metastatic neuroblastoma with good prognosis and spontaneous regression: a molecular portrait of stage 4S.

Authors:  Jean Bénard; Gilda Raguénez; Audrey Kauffmann; Alexander Valent; Hugues Ripoche; Virginie Joulin; Bastien Job; Gisèle Danglot; Sabrina Cantais; Thomas Robert; Marie-José Terrier-Lacombe; Agnès Chassevent; Serge Koscielny; Matthias Fischer; Frank Berthold; Marc Lipinski; Thomas Tursz; Philippe Dessen; Vladimir Lazar; Dominique Valteau-Couanet
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 6.603

3.  Serum sFas and tumor tissue FasL negatively correlated with survival in Egyptian patients suffering from breast ductal carcinoma.

Authors:  Ashgan I El-Sarha; Gehan M Magour; Sameh M Zaki; Mohamed Y El-Sammak
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  Inverse association of rab31 and mucin-1 (CA15-3) antigen levels in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer tissues with clinicopathological parameters and patients' prognosis.

Authors:  Matthias Kotzsch; Thomas Kirchner; Susanne Soelch; Sonja Schäfer; Katrin Friedrich; Gustavo Baretton; Viktor Magdolen; Thomas Luther
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  Expression analysis of mitotic spindle checkpoint genes in breast carcinoma: role of NDC80/HEC1 in early breast tumorigenicity, and a two-gene signature for aneuploidy.

Authors:  Ivan Bièche; Sophie Vacher; François Lallemand; Sengül Tozlu-Kara; Hind Bennani; Michèle Beuzelin; Keltouma Driouch; Etienne Rouleau; Florence Lerebours; Hugues Ripoche; Géraldine Cizeron-Clairac; Frédérique Spyratos; Rosette Lidereau
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 27.401

6.  Lymph node status as a guide to selection of available prognostic markers in breast cancer: the clinical practice of the future?

Authors:  A Elzagheid; T Kuopio; S Pyrhönen; Y Collan
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 2.644

7.  Prognostic impact of multidrug resistance gene expression on the management of breast cancer in the context of adjuvant therapy based on a series of 171 patients.

Authors:  L Moureau-Zabotto; S Ricci; J P Lefranc; F Coulet; C Genestie; M Antoine; S Uzan; J P Lotz; E Touboul; R Lacave
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-02-27       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  Taxane benefit in breast cancer--a role for grade and chromosomal stability.

Authors:  Roger P A'Hern; Mariam Jamal-Hanjani; A Marcell Szász; Stephen R D Johnston; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Rebecca Roylance; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  The CIN4 chromosomal instability qPCR classifier defines tumor aneuploidy and stratifies outcome in grade 2 breast cancer.

Authors:  Attila Marcell Szász; Qiyuan Li; Aron C Eklund; Zsófia Sztupinszki; Andrew Rowan; Anna-Mária Tőkés; Borbála Székely; András Kiss; Miklós Szendrői; Balázs Győrffy; Zoltán Szállási; Charles Swanton; Janina Kulka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: tumor characteristics and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Grazia Arpino; Valerie J Bardou; Gary M Clark; Richard M Elledge
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.