Literature DB >> 11307076

The bicipital groove as a landmark for orientation of the humeral prosthesis in cases of fracture.

G M Kontakis1, J Damilakis, J Christoforakis, A Papadakis, P Katonis, P Prassopoulos.   

Abstract

We studied 45 dry cadaveric humeri to determine whether the bicipital groove of the humerus can be used as a landmark for a proper, individualized orientation of a humeral prosthesis, especially in the case of a fracture. We performed 3 computed tomography sections (at a level just below the lower portion of the head, at the middle of the humeral head, and at a distance 5 cm below the first section), and we used special software for 3-dimensional image processing. To reproduce the individual posterior version of the head, when a humeral prosthesis is implanted for fracture, the lateral fin of the prosthesis should be a mean distance 5.2 +/- 2.6 mm (-1.5 to 10.7 mm) from the posterior edge of the bicipital groove. If the lateral fin of the humeral prosthesis seats just behind the posterior edge of the bicipital groove, a difference of -6.3 degrees to 41.7 degrees from the normal posterior version occurs. A new, simple methodology for an individualized posterior version of a humeral prosthesis in cases of fracture is proposed. We applied this in 6 consecutive patients with fracture of the humeral head that required hemiarthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11307076     DOI: 10.1067/mse.2001.112018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  7 in total

1.  CT scan method accurately assesses humeral head retroversion.

Authors:  P Boileau; R T Bicknell; N Mazzoleni; G Walch; J P Urien
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Lesser tuberosity is more reliable than bicipital groove when determining orientation of humeral head in primary shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rastislav Hromádka; Ales Antonín Kubena; David Pokorný; Stanislav Popelka; David Jahoda; Antonín Sosna
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Correlation between anatomical parameters of intertubercular sulcus and retroversion angle of humeral head.

Authors:  Zhaoxun Pan; Jun Chen; Lianjun Qu; Yan Cui; Chao Sun; Hongxin Zhang; Xiaoming Yang; Qingli Guan
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

4.  Proximal humeral fractures: an understanding of the ideal plate positioning.

Authors:  Pedro José Labronici; Rodrigo Pires e Albuquerque; Vinícius Schott; Robinson Esteves Santos Pires; Willian Dias Belangero; José Sérgio Franco
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Repositioning of the humeral tuberosities can be guided by pectoralis major insertion.

Authors:  Alec Cikes; Étienne Trudeau-Rivest; Fanny Canet; Jonah Hébert-Davies; Dominique M Rouleau
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2014-12-19

6.  The bicipital groove as a landmark for reconstruction of complex proximal humeral fractures with hybrid double plate osteosynthesis.

Authors:  Jan Theopold; Bastian Marquaß; Johannes Fakler; Hanno Steinke; Christoph Josten; Pierre Hepp
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Prediction of the rotational state of the humerus by comparing the contour of the contralateral bicipital groove: Method for intraoperative evaluation.

Authors:  Se-Jin Park; Eugene Kim; Hwa Jae Jeong; Jinmyung Lee; Shinsuk Park
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.251

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.