| Literature DB >> 11307076 |
G M Kontakis1, J Damilakis, J Christoforakis, A Papadakis, P Katonis, P Prassopoulos.
Abstract
We studied 45 dry cadaveric humeri to determine whether the bicipital groove of the humerus can be used as a landmark for a proper, individualized orientation of a humeral prosthesis, especially in the case of a fracture. We performed 3 computed tomography sections (at a level just below the lower portion of the head, at the middle of the humeral head, and at a distance 5 cm below the first section), and we used special software for 3-dimensional image processing. To reproduce the individual posterior version of the head, when a humeral prosthesis is implanted for fracture, the lateral fin of the prosthesis should be a mean distance 5.2 +/- 2.6 mm (-1.5 to 10.7 mm) from the posterior edge of the bicipital groove. If the lateral fin of the humeral prosthesis seats just behind the posterior edge of the bicipital groove, a difference of -6.3 degrees to 41.7 degrees from the normal posterior version occurs. A new, simple methodology for an individualized posterior version of a humeral prosthesis in cases of fracture is proposed. We applied this in 6 consecutive patients with fracture of the humeral head that required hemiarthroplasty.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2001 PMID: 11307076 DOI: 10.1067/mse.2001.112018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg ISSN: 1058-2746 Impact factor: 3.019