Literature DB >> 11307075

Sex-specific differences of subacromial space width during abduction, with and without muscular activity, and correlation with anthropometric variables.

H Graichen1, H Bonél, T Stammberger, K H Englmeier, M Reiser, F Eckstein.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to determine sex-specific differences of the subacromial space width during active and passive arm abduction and to analyze the correlation of this space with general and regional anthropometric variables. Fourteen healthy subjects (7 men, 7 women) were examined with an open magnetic resonance system at 30 degrees and 90 degrees of abduction (with and without muscle activity). After 3-dimensional reconstruction, the minimal acromiohumeral distance, the glenoid size, and the humeral head radius were determined. At 30 degrees of abduction, a significant difference of the acromiohumeral distance was observed between men (8.18 +/- 1.0 mm) and women (6.98 +/- 0.75 mm) (P < .05), but not at 90 degrees (6.7 +/- 2.0 mm versus 5.9 +/- 1.0 mm) or under muscle activity (4.9 +/- 2.4 mm versus 3.5 +/- 2.1 mm). Significant correlations between the acromiohumeral distance and anthropometric variables were found at 30 degrees of abduction (r = 0.48 to 0.72), but not at 90 degrees, with or without muscle activity (r = 0.21 to 0.55). The results demonstrate that at physical rest, the subacromial space width is dependent on sex, but the interindividual variability increases substantially during abduction and under muscle activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11307075     DOI: 10.1067/mse.2001.112056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  8 in total

1.  Validation of a new model-based tracking technique for measuring three-dimensional, in vivo glenohumeral joint kinematics.

Authors:  Michael J Bey; Roger Zauel; Stephanie K Brock; Scott Tashman
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  The radiographic acromiohumeral interval is affected by arm and radiographic beam position.

Authors:  Edward V Fehringer; Charles E Rosipal; David A Rhodes; Anthony J Lauder; Susan E Puumala; Connie A Feschuk; Matthew A Mormino; David E Hartigan
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  In vivo measurement of subacromial space width during shoulder elevation: technique and preliminary results in patients following unilateral rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Michael J Bey; Stephanie K Brock; William N Beierwaltes; Roger Zauel; Patricia A Kolowich; Terrence R Lock
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 4.  Shoulder kinematics impact subacromial proximities: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Rebekah L Lawrence; Jonathan P Braman; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Rotator cuff fatigue and glenohumeral kinematics in participants without shoulder dysfunction.

Authors:  Deydre S Teyhen; Joseph M Miller; Tansy R Middag; Edward J Kane
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Recruitment of Shoulder Complex and Torso Stabilizer Muscles With Rowing Exercises Using a Suspension Strap Training System.

Authors:  James W Youdas; Mary Kleis; Erik T Krueger; Stephen Thompson; Whitney A Walker; John H Hollman
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.843

7.  Handball-specific loading acutely reduces the acromiohumeral distance in experienced handball players and in non-handball experienced athletes.

Authors:  Carolin Rentz; Kirsten Legerlotz
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-09-16

8.  Evaluation of three-dimensional acromiohumeral distance in the standing position and comparison with its conventional measuring methods.

Authors:  Yuki Yoshida; Noboru Matsumura; Yoshitake Yamada; Minoru Yamada; Yoichi Yokoyama; Morio Matsumoto; Masaya Nakamura; Takeo Nagura; Masahiro Jinzaki
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.359

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.