Literature DB >> 11305221

Effect of liquid bolus consistency and delivery method on aspiration and pharyngeal retention in dysphagia patients.

K V Kuhlemeier1, J B Palmer, D Rosenberg.   

Abstract

There is no empirically derived consensus as to what food consistency types and method of food delivery (spoon, cup, straw) should be included in the videofluoroscopic swallowing (VFSS) studies. In the present study, we examine the rates of aspiration and pharyngeal retention in 190 dysphagic patients given thin (apple juice) and thick (apricot nectar) liquids delivered by teaspoon and cup and ultrathick (pudding-like) liquid delivered by teaspoon. Each patient was tested with each of the bolus/delivery method combinations. The fractions of patients exhibiting aspiration for each bolus/method of delivery combination were (1) thick liquids (cup), 13.2%; (2) thick liquids (spoon), 8.9%; (3) thin liquids (cup), 23.7%; (4) thin liquids (spoon), 15.8%, (5) ultrathick liquids (spoon), 5.8%. In each comparison [thick liquid (cup) vs. thick liquid (spoon), thin liquid (cup) vs. thin liquid (spoon), thick liquid (cup) vs. thin liquid (cup), thick liquid (spoon) vs. thin liquid (spoon), and thick liquid (spoon) vs. ultrathick liquid (spoon)], the p value for chi 2 was < 0.001. These results suggest that utilizing thin, thick, and ultrathick liquids and delivery by cup and spoon during a VFSS of a patient with mild or moderate dysphagia can increase the chances of identifying a consistency that the patient can swallow without aspirating and without pharyngeal retention after swallowing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11305221     DOI: 10.1007/s004550011003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dysphagia        ISSN: 0179-051X            Impact factor:   3.438


  41 in total

1.  Nasogastric tubes and videofluoroscopic swallowing studies in children.

Authors:  Mutaz Alnassar; Kamaldine Oudjhane; Jorge Davila
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-10-05

2.  Viscosity measurements of nectar- and honey-thick liquids: product, liquid, and time comparisons.

Authors:  Jane Mertz Garcia; Edgar Chambers; Ziad Matta; Megan Clark
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Effects of club soda and ginger brew on linguapalatal pressures in healthy swallowing.

Authors:  Kate Krival; Crystal Bates
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Effects of oral intake of water in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia.

Authors:  Martha J P Karagiannis; Leonie Chivers; Tom C Karagiannis
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 5.  [Diagnosis and treatment of dysphagia].

Authors:  S Cantemir; A Laubert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Rheological studies on the effect of different thickeners in texture-modified chicken rendang for individuals with dysphagia.

Authors:  Nuraihan Abu Zarim; Syahariza Zainul Abidin; Fazilah Ariffin
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 2.701

7.  The Association of 3-D Volume and 2-D Area of Post-swallow Pharyngeal Residue on CT Imaging.

Authors:  Rachel W Mulheren; Yoko Inamoto; Charles A Odonkor; Yuriko Ito; Seiko Shibata; Hitoshi Kagaya; Marlis Gonzalez-Fernandez; Eiichi Saitoh; Jeffrey B Palmer
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  Viscosity differences between thickened beverages suitable for elderly patients with dysphagia.

Authors:  Noé Garin; Jan Thomas De Pourcq; Raquel Martín-Venegas; Daniel Cardona; Ignasi Gich; Maria Antònia Mangues
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  Are we testing a true thin liquid?

Authors:  Traci A Fink; Jill B Ross
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 10.  Older adults with difficulty swallowing oral medicines: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Aoife Mc Gillicuddy; Abina M Crean; Laura J Sahm
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.