Literature DB >> 11304743

Aquatic prey capture in ray-finned fishes: a century of progress and new directions.

L A Ferry-Graham1, G V Lauder.   

Abstract

The head of ray-finned fishes is structurally complex and is composed of numerous bony, muscular, and ligamentous elements capable of intricate movement. Nearly two centuries of research have been devoted to understanding the function of this cranial musculoskeletal system during prey capture in the dense and viscous aquatic medium. Most fishes generate some amount of inertial suction to capture prey in water. In this overview we trace the history of functional morphological analyses of suction feeding in ray-finned fishes, with a particular focus on the mechanisms by which suction is generated, and present new data using a novel flow imaging technique that enables quantification of the water flow field into the mouth. We begin with a brief overview of studies of cranial anatomy and then summarize progress on understanding function as new information was brought to light by the application of various forms of technology, including high-speed cinematography and video, pressure, impedance, and bone strain measurement. We also provide data from a new technique, digital particle image velocimetry (DPIV) that allows us to quantify patterns of flow into the mouth. We believe that there are three general areas in which future progress needs to occur. First, quantitative three-dimensional studies of buccal and opercular cavity dimensions during prey capture are needed; sonomicrometry and endoscopy are techniques likely to yield these data. Second, a thorough quantitative analysis of the flow field into the mouth during prey capture is necessary to understand the effect of head movement on water in the vicinity of the prey; three-dimensional DPIV analyses will help to provide these data. Third, a more precise understanding of the fitness effects of structural and functional variables in the head coupled with rigorous statistical analyses will allow us to better understand the evolutionary consequences of intra- and interspecific variation in cranial morphology and function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11304743     DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Morphol        ISSN: 0022-2887            Impact factor:   1.804


  22 in total

1.  Directional selection has shaped the oral jaws of Lake Malawi cichlid fishes.

Authors:  R Craig Albertson; J Todd Streelman; Thomas D Kocher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Hydrodynamic modelling of aquatic suction performance and intra-oral pressures: limitations for comparative studies.

Authors:  Sam Van Wassenbergh; Peter Aerts; Anthony Herrel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  The forces exerted by aquatic suction feeders on their prey.

Authors:  Peter C Wainwright; Steven W Day
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Anterior-to-posterior wave of buccal expansion in suction feeding fishes is critical for optimizing fluid flow velocity profile.

Authors:  Kristin L Bishop; Peter C Wainwright; Roi Holzman
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  How fish power suction feeding.

Authors:  Mark W Westneat; Aaron M Olsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Hydrodynamic Simulations of the Performance Landscape for Suction-Feeding Fishes Reveal Multiple Peaks for Different Prey Types.

Authors:  Karin H Olsson; Christopher H Martin; Roi Holzman
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

7.  Channel catfish use higher coordination to capture prey than to swallow.

Authors:  Aaron M Olsen; L Patricia Hernández; Ariel L Camp; Elizabeth L Brainerd
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Aquatic feeding in pipid frogs: the use of suction for prey capture.

Authors:  Carrie A Carreño; Kiisa C Nishikawa
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Resolving within- and between-population variation in feeding ecology with a biomechanical model.

Authors:  Craig W Osenberg; Casey J F Huckins; Anthony Kaltenberg; Ari Martinez
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-08-03       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  A unique feeding strategy of the extinct marine mammal Kolponomos: convergence on sabretooths and sea otters.

Authors:  Z Jack Tseng; Camille Grohé; John J Flynn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.