Literature DB >> 11304019

Automatic attraction of attention to former targets in visual displays of letters.

S Kyllingsbaek1, W X Schneider, C Bundesen.   

Abstract

Shiffrin and Schneider (1977, Experiment 4d) reported that after consistent training in search for particular alphanumeric characters, presentation of one of these characters (former targets) as a distractor impeded detection of simultaneously presented current targets. Even if presented in an irrelevant display location, the former target appeared to attract attention. Here, we analyze weaknesses in the design of Experiment 4d and report four follow-up experiments ranging from a fairly close replication of the original multiframe experiment to a rather conventional single-frame search study. In each experiment, presentation of former targets consistently impeded detection of simultaneously presented current targets. The results suggest that automatic attention attraction to individual alphanumeric characters develops not only in the special experimental paradigm used by Shiffrin and Schneider, but also in standard visual search tasks. The fact that attention appeared to be attracted by shapes as complex as individual letters supports the assumption that simultaneously presented visual stimuli can be compared in parallel against memory representations of alphanumeric characters.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11304019     DOI: 10.3758/bf03200505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  28 in total

1.  The role of reward prediction in the control of attention.

Authors:  Anthony W Sali; Brian A Anderson; Steven Yantis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Eye movements as a gatekeeper for memorization: evidence for the persistence of attentional sets in visual memory search.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-05-28

3.  Value-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Patryk A Laurent; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Reward and attentional control in visual search.

Authors:  Steven Yantis; Brian A Anderson; Emma K Wampler; Patryk A Laurent
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

Review 5.  Measuring and modeling attentional dwell time.

Authors:  Anders Petersen; Søren Kyllingsbæk; Claus Bundesen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

Review 6.  A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Selection history is relative.

Authors:  Ming-Ray Liao; Mark K Britton; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Value-driven attentional and oculomotor capture during goal-directed, unconstrained viewing.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 9.  Basal ganglia circuits for reward value-guided behavior.

Authors:  Okihide Hikosaka; Hyoung F Kim; Masaharu Yasuda; Shinya Yamamoto
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  On the distinction between value-driven attention and selection history: Evidence from individuals with depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Michelle Chiu; Michelle M DiBartolo; Stephanie L Leal
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.