Literature DB >> 11303070

Structure-hepatic disposition relationships for cationic drugs in isolated perfused rat livers: transmembrane exchange and cytoplasmic binding process.

D Y Hung1, P Chang, M Weiss, M S Roberts.   

Abstract

This work studied the structure-hepatic disposition relationships for cationic drugs of varying lipophilicity using a single-pass, in situ rat liver preparation. The lipophilicity among the cationic drugs studied in this work is in the following order: diltiazem > propranolol > labetalol > prazosin > antipyrine > atenolol. Parameters characterizing the hepatic distribution and elimination kinetics of the drugs were estimated using the multiple indicator dilution method. The kinetic model used to describe drug transport (the "two-phase stochastic model") integrated cytoplasmic binding kinetics and belongs to the class of barrier-limited and space-distributed liver models. Hepatic extraction ratio (E) (0.30--0.92) increased with lipophilicity. The intracellular binding rate constant (k(on)) and the equilibrium amount ratios characterizing the slowly and rapidly equilibrating binding sites (K(S) and K(R)) increase with the lipophilicity of drug (k(on): 0.05--0.35 s(-1); K(S): 0.61--16.67; K(R): 0.36--0.95), whereas the intracellular unbinding rate constant (k(off)) decreases with the lipophilicity of drug (0.081--0.021 s(-1)). The partition ratio of influx (k(in)) and efflux rate constant (k(out)), k(in)/k(out), increases with increasing pK(a) value of the drug [from 1.72 for antipyrine (pK(a) = 1.45) to 9.76 for propranolol (pK(a) = 9.45)], the differences in k(in/kout) for the different drugs mainly arising from ion trapping in the mitochondria and lysosomes. The value of intrinsic elimination clearance (CL(int)), permeation clearance (CL(pT)), and permeability-surface area product (PS) all increase with the lipophilicity of drug [CL(int) (ml x min(-1) x g(-1) of liver): 10.08--67.41; CL(pT) (ml x min(-1) x g(-1) of liver): 10.80--5.35; PS (ml x min(-1) x g(-1) of liver): 14.59--90.54]. It is concluded that cationic drug kinetics in the liver can be modeled using models that integrate the presence of cytoplasmic binding, a hepatocyte barrier, and a vascular transit density function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11303070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  12 in total

Review 1.  Enterohepatic circulation: physiological, pharmacokinetic and clinical implications.

Authors:  Michael S Roberts; Beatrice M Magnusson; Frank J Burczynski; Michael Weiss
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Effect of erythrocytes on the hepatic distribution kinetics of antipyrine.

Authors:  Selma Sahin; Malcolm Rowland
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.441

3.  Hepatocellular necrosis, fibrosis and microsomal activity determine the hepatic pharmacokinetics of basic drugs in right-heart-failure-induced liver damage.

Authors:  Peng Li; Thomas A Robertson; Qian Zhang; Linda M Fletcher; Darrell H G Crawford; Michael Weiss; Michael S Roberts
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Characterization of the physiological spaces and distribution of tolbutamide in the perfused rat pancreas.

Authors:  Kent John Fanning; Michael S Roberts
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Physiologically based synthetic models of hepatic disposition.

Authors:  C Anthony Hunt; Glen E P Ropella; Li Yan; Daniel Y Hung; Michael S Roberts
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 2.745

6.  Modeling and simulation of hepatic drug disposition using a physiologically based, multi-agent in silico liver.

Authors:  Li Yan; Glen E P Ropella; Sunwoo Park; Michael S Roberts; C Anthony Hunt
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Hepatic pharmacokinetics of taurocholate in the normal and cholestatic rat liver.

Authors:  Daniel Y Hung; Gerhard A Siebert; Ping Chang; Michael S Roberts
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 8.  At the biological modeling and simulation frontier.

Authors:  C Anthony Hunt; Glen E P Ropella; Tai Ning Lam; Jonathan Tang; Sean H J Kim; Jesse A Engelberg; Shahab Sheikh-Bahaei
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  Therapeutic effects and possible mechanisms of a snake venom preparation in the fibrotic rat liver.

Authors:  Ping Chang; Daniel Y Hung; Gerhard A Siebert; Kim Bridle; Michael S Roberts
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Cloud computing and validation of expandable in silico livers.

Authors:  Glen E P Ropella; C Anthony Hunt
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2010-12-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.