Literature DB >> 11300750

Ankle images digital analysis (AIDA): digital measurement of joint space width and subchondral sclerosis on standard radiographs.

A C Marijnissen1, K L Vincken, M A Viergever, H L van Roy, P M Van Roermund, F P Lafeber, J W Bijlsma.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Reliable evaluation of joint space width and subchondral sclerosis of osteoarthritic joints is difficult. The present study describes a new digital method to analyse standard radiographs of the ankle.
DESIGN: Standardized radiographs were taken of the ankle of 12 patients with severe osteoarthritis (OA) under full weight-bearing conditions, before treatment and 1 year after initiation of treatment. Treatment consisted of 3 months distraction of the tibio-talar joint, for which clinical benefit has been shown previously. The width of the joint space was measured on digitized images of the radiographs by means of the newly developed semi-automatic digital technique called AIDA (Ankle Images Digital Analysis) and by means of the most widely used conventional analogue measurements. In addition, AIDA was used to assess subchondral sclerosis by measuring the intensity of the radiograph at fixed positions at the bone-cartilage interface.
RESULTS: AIDA appeared to be a reliable method for measuring small changes in joint space width and subchondral sclerosis because the intra- and interobserver variation was small. Mean JSW for two observers was 1.96 and 2.00 mm, with mean differences between two observations of 0.05 and -0.01, respectively. Mean subchondral sclerosis in the tibia was 1.52 and 1.61 with mean differences between two observations of, respectively, 0.00 and 0.03. In addition to conventional measurements, AIDA could demonstrate a decrease in subchondral sclerosis as a result of joint distraction of 71% and 69% after 1 year for talus and tibia, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The use of AIDA is preferable to the conventional analogue method for evaluating the severity of ankle OA, because the method provides quantitative data not only for the joint space width but also for subchondral sclerosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11300750     DOI: 10.1053/joca.2000.0384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  6 in total

1.  Intermediate-term follow-up after ankle distraction for treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Mai P Nguyen; Douglas R Pedersen; Yubo Gao; Charles L Saltzman; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Motion versus fixed distraction of the joint in the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Charles L Saltzman; Stephen L Hillis; Mary P Stolley; Donald D Anderson; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Ankle distraction arthroplasty (ADA): A brief review and technical pearls.

Authors:  Austin T Fragomen
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-11-18

Review 4.  Joint distraction for osteoarthritis: clinical evidence and molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  Mylène P Jansen; Simon C Mastbergen
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 20.543

5.  Quantification of the radiographic joint space width of the ankle.

Authors:  Berna Goker; Emel Gonen; Mehmet D Demirag; Joel A Block
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Minimum distraction gap: how much ankle joint space is enough in ankle distraction arthroplasty?

Authors:  Austin T Fragomen; Thomas H McCoy; Kathleen N Meyers; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-09-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.