Austin T Fragomen1, Thomas H McCoy2, Kathleen N Meyers3, S Robert Rozbruch1. 1. Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065 USA ; Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021 USA. 2. Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115 USA. 3. Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021 USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The success of ankle distraction arthroplasty relies on the separation of the tibiotalar articular surfaces. QUESTION/ PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to find the minimum distraction gap needed to ensure that the tibiotalar joint surfaces would not contact each other with full weight-bearing while under distraction. METHODS: Circular external fixators were mounted to nine cadaver ankle specimens. Each specimen was then placed into a custom-designed load chamber. Loads of 0, 350, and 700N were applied to the specimen. Radiographic joint space was measured and joint contact pressure was monitored under each load. The external fixator was then sequentially distracted, and the radiographic joint space was measured under the three different loads. The experiment was stopped when there was no joint contact under 700N of load. The radiographic joint space was measured and the initial (undistracted) radiographic joint space was subtracted from it yielding the distraction gap. The minimum distraction gap (mDG) that would provide total unloading was calculated. RESULTS: The average mDG was 2.4 mm (range, 1.6 to 4.0 mm) at 700N of load, 4.4 mm (range, 3.7 to 5.8 mm) at 350N of load, and 4.9 mm (range, 3.7 to 7.0 mm) at 0N of load. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that if the radiographic joint space of on a standing X-ray of an ankle undergoing distraction arthroplasty shows a minimum of 5.8 mm of DG, then there will be no contact between joint surfaces during full weight-bearing. Therefore, 5 mm of radiographic joint space, as recommended historically, may not be adequate to prevent contact of the articular surfaces during weight-bearing.
BACKGROUND: The success of ankle distraction arthroplasty relies on the separation of the tibiotalar articular surfaces. QUESTION/ PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to find the minimum distraction gap needed to ensure that the tibiotalar joint surfaces would not contact each other with full weight-bearing while under distraction. METHODS: Circular external fixators were mounted to nine cadaver ankle specimens. Each specimen was then placed into a custom-designed load chamber. Loads of 0, 350, and 700N were applied to the specimen. Radiographic joint space was measured and joint contact pressure was monitored under each load. The external fixator was then sequentially distracted, and the radiographic joint space was measured under the three different loads. The experiment was stopped when there was no joint contact under 700N of load. The radiographic joint space was measured and the initial (undistracted) radiographic joint space was subtracted from it yielding the distraction gap. The minimum distraction gap (mDG) that would provide total unloading was calculated. RESULTS: The average mDG was 2.4 mm (range, 1.6 to 4.0 mm) at 700N of load, 4.4 mm (range, 3.7 to 5.8 mm) at 350N of load, and 4.9 mm (range, 3.7 to 7.0 mm) at 0N of load. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that if the radiographic joint space of on a standing X-ray of an ankle undergoing distraction arthroplasty shows a minimum of 5.8 mm of DG, then there will be no contact between joint surfaces during full weight-bearing. Therefore, 5 mm of radiographic joint space, as recommended historically, may not be adequate to prevent contact of the articular surfaces during weight-bearing.
Authors: F Intema; T P Thomas; D D Anderson; J M Elkins; T D Brown; A Amendola; F P J G Lafeber; C L Saltzman Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2011-02-13 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: A A van Valburg; P M van Roermund; A C Marijnissen; M J Wenting; A J Verbout; F P Lafeber; J W Bijlsma Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: A A van Valburg; P M van Roermund; J Lammens; J van Melkebeek; A J Verbout; E P Lafeber; J W Bijlsma Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Br Date: 1995-09
Authors: Nazzar Tellisi; Austin T Fragomen; Dawn Kleinman; Martin J O'Malley; S Robert Rozbruch Journal: Foot Ankle Int Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 2.827
Authors: Amgad M Haleem; Sherif Galal; Ogonna K Nwawka; Angela Balagadde; Eugene W Borst; Huong T Do; Douglas N Mintz; Austin T Fragomen; S Robert Rozbruch Journal: Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr Date: 2020 Sep-Dec
Authors: Hongmou Zhao; Wenqing Qu; Yi Li; Xiaojun Liang; Ning Ning; Yan Zhang; Dong Hu Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Date: 2017-01-26 Impact factor: 2.359
Authors: James My Chowdhury; Beth Lineham; Matthew Pallett; Hemant G Pandit; Todd D Stewart; Paul J Harwood Journal: Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr Date: 2021 May-Aug