Literature DB >> 11298218

Focus groups as a research method: a critique of some aspects of their use in nursing research.

C Webb1, J Kevern.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and critique reports in the nursing literature in the period 1990-1999 of the use of focus groups as a research method.
METHODS: The articles were identified by a computerized search of the CINAHL database and subjected to critical review.
FINDINGS: The result of the search was that very few articles were found that reported on a specific piece of research using the method. Methodological discussions were more common and these were sometimes at a somewhat superficial level without analysis or critique. The largest category of articles was concerned with service development projects. The research-based articles were found to be relatively unsophisticated in their use of the method, in particular in relation to data analysis and social interaction within focus groups. Terms such as 'content analysis' and 'grounded theory' were used in nonrigorous ways and incompatibility between the underlying research approach and implementation of the method was identified in the cases of phenomenology and grounded theory. Whilst selection of the focus group method was often justified in terms of the benefits that participant interaction could yield, this interaction was rarely reported or discussed in the articles. One author proposed a scheme for analysing this type of interaction, and this is recommended to future researchers as a possible framework for interaction analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: The article concludes by calling for more in-depth consideration at the research planning stages of the underlying assumptions of methodological approaches that may be used to underpin focus group research and methods to be used to analyse and report the data generated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11298218     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01720.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  30 in total

1.  A multi-disciplinary education process related to the discharging of children from hospital when the child has been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes--a qualitative study.

Authors:  Lisbeth Jönsson; Inger Hallström; Anita Lundqvist
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 2.125

2.  Focus groups to reveal parents' needs for prenatal education.

Authors:  Louise Dumas
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2002

3.  Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: controversies and recommendations.

Authors:  Deborah J Cohen; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Cancer Worry Among Urban Dominican Women: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Alsacia L Sepulveda-Pacsi; Grenny Hiraldo; Keville Frederickson
Journal:  J Transcult Nurs       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 1.959

5.  Split-Session Focus Group Interviews in the Naturalistic Setting of Family Medicine Offices.

Authors:  Michael D Fetters; Timothy C Guetterman; Debra Power; Donald E Nease
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Using mind mapping techniques for rapid qualitative data analysis in public participation processes.

Authors:  Jilla Burgess-Allen; Vicci Owen-Smith
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Person-environment interactions contributing to nursing home resident falls.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Hill; Tam H Nguyen; Maya Shaha; Jennifer A Wenzel; Bruce R DeForge; Ann Marie Spellbring
Journal:  Res Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 1.571

8.  Resident-to-resident aggression in long-term care facilities: insights from focus groups of nursing home residents and staff.

Authors:  Tony Rosen; Mark S Lachs; Ashok J Bharucha; Scott M Stevens; Jeanne A Teresi; Flor Nebres; Karl Pillemer
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  What about N? A methodological study of sample-size reporting in focus group studies.

Authors:  Benedicte Carlsen; Claire Glenton
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Women's experiences of factors that facilitate or inhibit gestational diabetes self-management.

Authors:  Mary Carolan; Gurjeet K Gill; Cheryl Steele
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.