Literature DB >> 11296580

Comparison between magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging and transcranial Doppler ultrasound with regard to blood flow velocity in intracranial arteries: work in progress.

J Seitz1, M Strotzer, J Schlaier, W R Nitz, M Völk, S Feuerbach.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors evaluate blood flow velocities in the medial cerebral artery (MCA) and the basilar artery using magnetic resonance (MR) phase contrast technique in comparison with transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD). Eleven healthy male volunteers were studied. TCD of the MCA (n = 22) and basilar artery (n = 11) was performed. MR phase velocity mapping was done in each vessel at the same location where the TCD signal had been acquired. A 2-dimensional FLASH sequence with retrospective cardiac gating and an average temporal resolution of 45 ms was used. Resistance indices (RIs) and pulsatility indices (PIs) were calculated for both modalities. The TCD insonation angle was measured retrospectively with MR, and TCD velocities were corrected based on these measurements. The comparison of flow velocities obtained with TCD and MR led to a low correlation coefficient with regard to the basilar artery and the MCA: maximum systolic velocity, r = 0.02 and r = 0.50, respectively; enddiastolic velocity, r = 0.47 and r = 0.65, respectively; mean velocity, r = 0.52 and r = 0.66, respectively. The average PIs in the basilar artery and the MCA were 0.80 and 0.81 with MR and 0.65 and 0.85 with TCD, respectively. The average RIs in the basilar artery and the MCA were 0.52 and 0.54 with MR and 0.52 and 0.55 with TCD, respectively. The TCD insonation angle differed significantly from the ideal value in the basilar artery (mean value = 32.6 degrees) and the MCA (mean value = 26.5 degrees). The authors find a low correlation between velocities measured with MRI and TCD but similar results with regard to the PIs and RIs. Several sources of error, such as a nonideal TCD insonation angle, were identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11296580     DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2001.tb00021.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neuroimaging        ISSN: 1051-2284            Impact factor:   2.486


  5 in total

1.  Normal ranges and test-retest reproducibility of flow and velocity parameters in intracranial arteries measured with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Maria Correia de Verdier; Johan Wikström
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  A cross-sectional, case-control study of intracranial arterial wall thickness and complete blood count measures in sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Shuai Yuan; Lori C Jordan; Larry T Davis; Petrice M Cogswell; Chelsea A Lee; Niral J Patel; Spencer L Waddle; Meher Juttukonda; R Sky Jones; Allison Griffin; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 6.998

3.  Quantitative time-of-flight MR angiography for simultaneous luminal and hemodynamic evaluation of the intracranial arteries.

Authors:  Ioannis Koktzoglou; Rong Huang; Robert R Edelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Theory and validation of magnetic resonance fluid motion estimation using intensity flow data.

Authors:  Kelvin Kian Loong Wong; Richard Malcolm Kelso; Stephen Grant Worthley; Prashanthan Sanders; Jagannath Mazumdar; Derek Abbott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cerebral Blood Flow Response to Simulated Hypovolemia in Essential Hypertension: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Sandra Neumann; Amy E Burchell; Jonathan C L Rodrigues; Christopher B Lawton; Daniel Burden; Melissa Underhill; Matthew D Kobetić; Zoe H Adams; Jonathan C W Brooks; Angus K Nightingale; Julian F R Paton; Mark C K Hamilton; Emma C Hart
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 10.190

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.