Literature DB >> 11295211

Reduction of irradiated small bowel volume and accurate patient positioning by use of a bellyboard device in pelvic radiotherapy of gynecological cancer patients.

M Olofsen-van Acht1, H van den Berg, S Quint, H de Boer, M Seven, J van Sömsen de Koste, C Creutzberg, A Visser.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To reduce the volume of small bowel within pelvic treatment fields for gynecological cancer using a bellyboard device and to determine the accuracy of the prone treatment position.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen consecutive patients with a gynecologic malignancy who were treated with postoperative pelvic radiotherapy were selected for this study. The volume of small bowel within the treatment fields was calculated for both the supine and prone treatment positions. The patients were treated in the prone position in a so-called bellyboard device. During treatment sessions electronic portal images were obtained. An off-line setup verification and correction protocol was used and the setup accuracy of the positioning in the bellyboard was determined.
RESULTS: The average volume of small bowel within the treatment fields was 229 cm(3) and 66 cm(3) in the supine and prone treatment, respectively, which means an average volume reduction in the prone position of 64% (95% CI 56-72%), as compared with the supine position. For the position of the patient in the field, the systematic error defined by the standard deviation (SD) of the mean difference per patient between simulation and treatment images was 1.7 mm in the lateral direction, 2.1 mm in the craniocaudal direction and 1.7 mm in the ventrodorsal direction. On average, only 0.4 setup correction per patient was required to achieve this accuracy. The random day-to-day variations were 1.9 (1SD), 2.6 and 2.3 mm, respectively. Standard deviations of the systematic differences between patient positioning relative to the bellyboard were 6.2 mm in lateral direction and 9.1 mm in craniocaudal direction.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of gynecological cancer patients in the prone position using a bellyboard reduces the volume of irradiated small bowel. An off-line verification and correction protocol ensures accurate patient positioning. Daily setup variations using the bellyboard were small (1 SD<3 mm). Therefore for pelvic radiotherapy in patients with a gynecological malignancy, the use of a bellyboard is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11295211     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(00)00279-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  7 in total

1.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy with a belly board for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Joo Young Kim; Dae Yong Kim; Tae Hyun Kim; Sung Yong Park; Se Byeong Lee; Kyung Hwan Shin; Hongryull Pyo; Joo-Young Kim; Kwan Ho Cho
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer. An intra-individual comparison of prone and supine positioning.

Authors:  Carmen Stromberger; Yves Kom; Michael Kawgan-Kagan; Tristan Mensing; Ulrich Jahn; Achim Schneider; Volker Budach; Christhardt Köhler; Simone Marnitz
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  Dose Escalation with Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) Using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) in Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Abdullah Alsuhaibani; Ahmed Elashwah; Rana Mahmood; Alaa Abduljabbar; Samar Alhomoud; Luai Ashari; Shouki Bazarbashi; Ali Aljubran; Ahmed Alzahrani; Muhamed Mohiuddin; Hadeel Almanea; Hussah Alhussaini; Nasser AlSanea
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2018-07-14

Review 4.  Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic cancers.

Authors:  Theresa A Lawrie; John T Green; Mark Beresford; Linda Wedlake; Sorrel Burden; Susan E Davidson; Simon Lal; Caroline C Henson; H Jervoise N Andreyev
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-01-23

5.  Positioning accuracy during VMAT of gynecologic malignancies and the resulting dosimetric impact by a 6-degree-of-freedom couch in combination with daily kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Lihong Yao; Lihong Zhu; Junjie Wang; Lu Liu; Shun Zhou; ShuKun Jiang; Qianqian Cao; Ang Qu; Suqing Tian
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  How much margin do we need for pelvic lymph nodes irradiation in the era of IGRT?

Authors:  Zhikai Liu; Xia Liu; Fuquan Zhang; Ke Hu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 4.207

7.  Prospective evaluation of the setup errors and its impact on safety margin for cervical cancer pelvic conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  Avinash Badajena; Vijay Parshuram Raturi; Kirti Sirvastava; Hidehiro Hojo; Hajime Ohyoshi; Yanping Bei; Toshiya Rachi; Chen-Ta Wu; Taku Tochinai; Masayuki Okumura; Haiqin Zhang; Hirotaki Kouta; Pragya Verma; Geeta Singh; Abhishek Anand; Anjali Sachan
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-02-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.