Literature DB >> 11294813

Cell therapy attenuates deleterious ventricular remodeling and improves cardiac performance after myocardial infarction.

M Jain1, H DerSimonian, D A Brenner, S Ngoy, P Teller, A S Edge, A Zawadzka, K Wetzel, D B Sawyer, W S Colucci, C S Apstein, R Liao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction (MI) promotes deleterious remodeling of the myocardium, resulting in ventricular dilation and pump dysfunction. We examined whether supplementing infarcted myocardium with skeletal myoblasts would (1) result in viable myoblast implants, (2) attenuate deleterious remodeling, and (3) enhance in vivo and ex vivo contractile performance. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Experimental MI was induced by 1-hour coronary ligation followed by reperfusion in adult male Lewis rats. One week after MI, 10(6) myoblasts were injected directly into the infarct region. Three groups of animals were studied at 3 and 6 weeks after cell therapy: noninfarcted control (control), MI plus sham injection (MI), and MI plus cell injection (MI+cell). In vivo cardiac function was assessed by maximum exercise capacity testing and ex vivo function was determined by pressure-volume curves obtained from isolated, red cell-perfused, balloon-in-left ventricle (LV) hearts. MI and MI+cell hearts had indistinguishable infarct sizes of approximately 30% of the LV. At 3 and 6 weeks after cell therapy, 92% (13 of 14) of MI+cell hearts showed evidence of myoblast graft survival. MI+cell hearts exhibited attenuation of global ventricular dilation and reduced septum-to-free wall diameter compared with MI hearts not receiving cell therapy. Furthermore, cell therapy improved both post-MI in vivo exercise capacity and ex vivo LV systolic pressures.
CONCLUSIONS: Implanted skeletal myoblasts form viable grafts in infarcted myocardium, resulting in enhanced post-MI exercise capacity and contractile function and attenuated ventricular dilation. These data illustrate that syngeneic myoblast implantation after MI improves both in vivo and ex vivo indexes of global ventricular dysfunction and deleterious remodeling and suggests that cellular implantation may be beneficial after MI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11294813     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.103.14.1920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  45 in total

Review 1.  Cardiomyocyte transplantation into the failing heart-new therapeutic approach for heart failure?

Authors:  Thorsten Reffelmann; Jonathan Leor; Jochen Müller-Ehmsen; Larry Kedes; Robert A Kloner
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  On the fate of skeletal myoblasts in a cardiac environment: down-regulation of voltage-gated ion channels.

Authors:  H C Ott; S Berjukow; R Marksteiner; E Margreiter; G Böck; G Laufer; S Hering
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-06-11       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Synthetic matrices to serve as niches for muscle cell transplantation.

Authors:  Sarah Fernandes; Shannon Kuklok; Joe McGonigle; Hans Reinecke; Charles E Murry
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 2.481

Review 4.  Stem cell therapy for ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Mohammad Nurulqadr Jameel; Jianyi Zhang
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 8.401

Review 5.  Stem cells and cardiac repair: a critical analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan H Dinsmore; Nabil Dib
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 6.  The paracrine effect: pivotal mechanism in cell-based cardiac repair.

Authors:  Simon Maltais; Jacques P Tremblay; Louis P Perrault; Hung Q Ly
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 7.  Molecular imaging of cardiac stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Ahmad Y Sheikh; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  Stem cells in the heart: what's the buzz all about? Part 2: Arrhythmic risks and clinical studies.

Authors:  Rachel Ruckdeschel Smith; Lucio Barile; Elisa Messina; Eduardo Marbán
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 9.  Systems approaches to preventing transplanted cell death in cardiac repair.

Authors:  Thomas E Robey; Mark K Saiget; Hans Reinecke; Charles E Murry
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 5.000

10.  Cell transplantation for cardiac regeneration: where do we stand?

Authors:  E J van den Bos; W J van der Giessen; D J Duncker
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.