Literature DB >> 11294226

Viewpoint dependence in visual and haptic object recognition.

F N Newell1, M O Ernst, B S Tjan, H H Bülthoff.   

Abstract

On the whole, people recognize objects best when they see the objects from a familiar view and worse when they see the objects from views that were previously occluded from sight. Unexpectedly, we found haptic object recognition to be viewpoint-specific as well, even though hand movements were unrestricted. This viewpoint dependence was due to the hands preferring the back "view" of the objects. Furthermore, when the sensory modalities (visual vs. haptic) differed between learning an object and recognizing it, recognition performance was best when the objects were rotated back-to-front between learning and recognition. Our data indicate that the visual system recognizes the front view of objects best, whereas the hand recognizes objects best from the back.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11294226     DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  48 in total

Review 1.  Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective.

Authors:  Lawrence W Way; Lygia Stewart; Walter Gantert; Kingsway Liu; Crystine M Lee; Karen Whang; John G Hunter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Tactual perception: a review of experimental variables and procedures.

Authors:  Alexandra M Fernandes; Pedro B Albuquerque
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-06-06

3.  The effect of temporal delay and spatial differences on cross-modal object recognition.

Authors:  Andrew T Woods; Sile O'Modhrain; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 4.  Haptic object perception: spatial dimensionality and relation to vision.

Authors:  Roberta L Klatzky; Susan J Lederman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Effects of vision and haptics on categorizing common objects.

Authors:  Susan Haag
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-08-19

6.  Are surface properties integrated into visuohaptic object representations?

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Jenelle Hall; K Sathian
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Remapping motion across modalities: tactile rotations influence visual motion judgments.

Authors:  Martin V Butz; Roland Thomaschke; Matthias J Linhardt; Oliver Herbort
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Crossmodal enhancement in the LOC for visuohaptic object recognition over development.

Authors:  R Joanne Jao; Thomas W James; Karin Harman James
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Illusory visual-depth reversal can modulate sensations of contact surface.

Authors:  Yuka Igarashi; Keiko Omori; Tetsuya Arai; Yasunori Aizawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  "Can touch this": Cross-modal shape categorization performance is associated with microstructural characteristics of white matter association pathways.

Authors:  Haemy Lee Masson; Christian Wallraven; Laurent Petit
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.