Literature DB >> 11293777

Improving clinical histories on radiology requisitions.

R B Gunderman1, M D Phillips, M D Cohen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) regards billing for radiologic examinations without an appropriate indication as unlawful, and both the referring physician and the radiologist are liable. HCFA regulations are interpreted as requiring that all requisitions for radiologic examinations include a current diagnosis and appropriate indication for the study. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the rates at which requisitions currently meet these criteria and to assess the effectiveness of a simple intervention designed to improve them.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty consecutive chest radiography requisitions were examined to determine the rate at which current diagnoses and appropriate indications were present. An intervention was then implemented that included a month-long effort to inform referring physicians and radiologists of HCFA regulations, followed by a 1-week period during which requested examinations were not performed unless accompanied by a clinical diagnosis and appropriate indication. Another 150 consecutive chest radiography requisitions were then assessed to determine the effect of the intervention. A 3-month follow-up sample of a third set of 150 consecutive requisitions was then obtained.
RESULTS: The intervention produced a 69% decrease in the rate at which current diagnoses were missing from requisitions, and a 61% decrease in the corresponding rate for appropriate indications. Both results are significant with chi2 analysis at the P = .001 level. After 3 months with no additional intervention, rates decayed back toward baseline, with only a 35% remaining decrease for current diagnosis and an 18% decrease for appropriate indication.
CONCLUSION: The intervention performed in this study significantly reduces the rate of noncompliance with HCFA regulations. However, this improvement decays over time if it is not reinforced.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11293777     DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80498-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  7 in total

1.  Evaluating the Referring Physician's Clinical History and Indication as a Means for Communicating Chronic Conditions That Are Pertinent at the Point of Radiologic Interpretation.

Authors:  Piotr Obara; Merlijn Sevenster; Adam Travis; Yuechen Qian; Charles Westin; Paul J Chang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Inadequate Clinical Indications in Computed Tomography Chest and Abdomen/Pelvis Scans.

Authors:  Alyssa Finger; Mark Harris; Emily Nishimura; Hyo-Chun Yoon
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2018

Review 3.  Bias in Radiology: The How and Why of Misses and Misinterpretations.

Authors:  Lindsay P Busby; Jesse L Courtier; Christine M Glastonbury
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Impact of PACS-EMR Integration on Radiologist Usage of the EMR.

Authors:  John Mongan; David Avrin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Suitability of three indicators measuring the quality of coordination within hospitals.

Authors:  Etienne Minvielle; Henri Leleu; Frédéric Capuano; Catherine Grenier; Philippe Loirat; Laurent Degos
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Project to Improve the Transcription of Clinical Order Information into a Radiology Information System.

Authors:  Michael J Mills; John X Nguyen; Ben Himelhoch; Abdelouahid Souala; Anthony Khashola; Sumita Joseph; Phillip Rathousky; Roger Gonda; Michael C Y Juan
Journal:  Spartan Med Res J       Date:  2018-09-26

7.  Prevalence of unjustified emergency department x-ray examination referrals performed in a regional Queensland hospital: A pilot study.

Authors:  Marnie Rawle; Alison Pighills
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2018-07-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.