Literature DB >> 11293752

Follow-up of selective endoscopic ultrasonography and/or endoscopic retrograde cholangiography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study of 300 patients.

S V Berdah1, P Orsoni, T Bege, M Barthet, J C Grimaud, R Picaud.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: This prospective study evaluated the selective use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in the context of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1993 and 1998, LC for symptomatic gallstones was indicated in 300 consecutive patients. In order to diagnose and treat choledocholithiasis preoperatively, we performed, on the basis of preoperative criteria, ERC in "high-risk" patients and EUS in "intermediate-risk" patients. Choledocholithiasis was treated by preoperative biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy (BES). LC was performed either after the endoscopic procedure or directly in "low-risk" patients.
RESULTS: A total of 104 patients (35%) had 118 preoperative procedures: a) EUS (n = 68; feasibility 100%): choledocholithiasis was observed in 14/68 patients (21%); b) ERC (n = 50; feasibility 94%): 36 ERC were indicated on on preoperative criteria, and 14 on the basis of EUS results. Choledocholithiasis was found in 41/ 50 patients (82%) (13/14 patients with positive EUS), 19% of "intermediate-risk" patients, and 78% of "high-risk" patients; ERC failed in three patients who had no choledocholithiasis on subsequent intraoperative cholangiography (IOC). Clearance of the common bile duct (CBD) was achieved after BES in 41/41 patients. There was no mortality; complications occurred in 4/ 300 patients (1%). No retained stones were found in patients of any of the three groups, after a mean follow-up of 32 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Combined endoscopic and laparoscopie management of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis is a viable option and is optimized by the use of EUS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11293752     DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-12796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  7 in total

1.  Prospective study of scoring system in selective intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Xiao-Dong Sun; Xiao-Yan Cai; Jun-Da Li; Xiu-Jun Cai; Yi-Ping Mu; Jin-Min Wu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Endoscopic ultrasonography: imaging and beyond.

Authors:  T Rösch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Is endoscopic ultrasound needed as an add-on test for gallstone diseases without choledocholithiasis on multidetector computed tomography?

Authors:  Byoung Wook Bang; Ji Taek Hong; Young Chul Choi; Seok Jeong; Don Haeng Lee; Hyung Kil Kim; Shin Goo Park; Yong Sun Jeon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a case-control study comparing the short- and long-term outcomes for a "laparoscopy-first" attitude with the outcome for sequential treatment (systematic endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy).

Authors:  Renato Costi; Antonio Mazzeo; Francesco Tartamella; Christine Manceau; Bernard Vacher; Alain Valverde
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus intraoperative cholangiography for diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Vanja Giljaca; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

Review 6.  Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Vanja Giljaca; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

Review 7.  Does endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography reduce the risk of local pancreatic complications in acute pancreatitis? A systematic review and metaanalysis.

Authors:  Maxim S Petrov; Antonina F Uchugina; Mikhail V Kukosh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 4.584

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.