Literature DB >> 10824339

Sex differences in cardiovascular disease: are women with low socioeconomic status at high risk?

E A Vogels1, A L Lagro-Janssen, C van Weel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is still portrayed as a typical male disease, and men are more often submitted to invasive procedures or referred earlier. AIM: To explore sex differences in morbidity and referral patterns in cardiovascular disease in general practice, and the role of age and socioeconomic status.
METHOD: Data were obtained from a continuous morbidity registration project in the Netherlands from 1986 to 1995 in which 12,000 patients were followed over 10 years. The effects of sex, age, and socioeconomic status on morbidity of cardiovascular disease and the referral patterns were established.
RESULTS: The sex difference in morbidity becomes smaller with increasing age. Morbidity was highest in the lower socioeconomic status in general and for angina pectoris in particular. Women with angina pectoris with low socioeconomic status have a relative risk of 2.24 (CI = 1.17-3.26) compared with women with high socioeconomic status. In men, no significant difference was found between the socioeconomic status groups. For angina pectoris the sex difference in referral to the specialist was most significant: 50.6% and 26.6% (P = 0.002) for men and women respectively.
CONCLUSION: For women, low socioeconomic status was associated with relatively higher morbidity of angina pectoris and myocardial infarction than for men. Women are less likely to be referred than men are, in particular for angina pectoris.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10824339      PMCID: PMC1313580     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  14 in total

1.  Social inequality in coronary heart disease: a comparison of occupational classifications.

Authors:  T Chandola
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  Hazards, risks, and threats of heart disease from the early stages to symptomatic coronary heart disease and cardiac failure.

Authors:  W B Kannel
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 3.  Cardiovascular health and disease in women.

Authors:  N K Wenger; L Speroff; B Packard
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-07-22       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Referral patterns for coronary artery disease treatment: gender bias or good clinical judgment?

Authors:  N A Bickell; K S Pieper; K L Lee; D B Mark; D D Glower; D B Pryor; R M Califf
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-05-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Women, work and coronary heart disease: prospective findings from the Framingham heart study.

Authors:  S G Haynes; M Feinleib
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Increased mortality of women in coronary artery bypass surgery: evidence for referral bias.

Authors:  S S Khan; S Nessim; R Gray; L S Czer; A Chaux; J Matloff
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Risk factors for coronary heart disease and level of education. The Tromsø Heart Study.

Authors:  B K Jacobsen; D S Thelle
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Social class and ischaemic heart disease: use of the male:female ratio to identify possible occupational hazards.

Authors:  R F Heller; H Williams; Y Sittampalam
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Menopause and risk factors for coronary heart disease.

Authors:  K A Matthews; E Meilahn; L H Kuller; S F Kelsey; A W Caggiula; R R Wing
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-09-07       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Contribution of job control and other risk factors to social variations in coronary heart disease incidence.

Authors:  M G Marmot; H Bosma; H Hemingway; E Brunner; S Stansfeld
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-07-26       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  14 in total

1.  Inequalities in access to care for patients with ischaemic heart disease.

Authors:  Julia Hippisley-Cox
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Treating the patient or the population? Part 1. Judging the benefit of treatment of individual patients.

Authors:  T D Heller; R F Heller; S Pattison; R Fletcher
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-07

3.  Sex differences in vascular reactivity of coronary artery bypass graft conduits.

Authors:  Amenah Jaghoori; Victor Lamin; Rachel Jacobczak; Michael Worthington; James Edwards; Fabiano Viana; Robert Stuklis; David P Wilson; John F Beltrame
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  The epidemiology of medical treatment for glaucoma and ocular hypertension in the United Kingdom: 1994 to 2003.

Authors:  C G Owen; I M Carey; S De Wilde; P H Whincup; R Wormald; D G Cook
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Sex inequalities in ischaemic heart disease in general practice: cross sectional survey.

Authors:  J Hippisley-Cox; M Pringle; N Crown; A Meal; A Wynn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-07

6.  First myocardial infarction in a Dutch general practice population: trends in incidence from 1975-2003.

Authors:  Carel Bakx; Judith Schwarte; Henk van den Hoogen; Hans Bor; Chris van Weel
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Coronary heart disease prevention and age inequalities: the first year of the National Service Framework for CHD.

Authors:  Julia Hippisley-Cox; Michael Pringle; Ruth Cater; Carol Coupland; Andy Meal
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Improvements in total mortality and lipid levels after acute myocardial infarction in an English health district (1995-1999).

Authors:  J Harrop; R Donnelly; A Rowbottom; M Holt; A R Scott
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Should years of schooling be used to guide treatment of coronary risk factors?

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Peter Franks
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

10.  Parental education is related to C-reactive protein among female middle-aged community volunteers.

Authors:  Jennifer E Phillips; Anna L Marsland; Janine D Flory; Matthew F Muldoon; Sheldon Cohen; Stephen B Manuck
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 7.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.