Literature DB >> 11288839

MR urography: examination techniques and clinical applications.

C C Nolte-Ernsting1, G B Adam, R W Günther.   

Abstract

Modern MR urography is performed on the basis of two different imaging strategies, which can be used complementarily to cover almost all aspects in the diagnosis of upper urinary tract diseases. The first technique utilizes unenhanced, heavily T2-weighted pulse sequences to obtain static-fluid images of the urinary tract. T2-weighted MR urograms have proved to be excellent in the visualization of the markedly dilated urinary tract, even if the renal excretory function is quiescent. Static-fluid MR urography is less suitable for imaging of disorders that occur in the nondilated collecting system. The second MR urography technique is analogous to the methodology of conventional intravenous pyelography and is, therefore, designated as excretory MR urography. For this purpose, a non-nephrotoxic gadolinium chelate is intravenously administered and after its renal excretion, the gadolinium-enhanced urine is visualized using fast T1-weighted gradient-echo sequences. The combination of gadolinium and low-dose furosemide (5-10 mg) is the key for achieving a uniform distribution of the contrast material inside the entire urinary tract and, secondly, to avoid high endoluminal gadolinium concentrations, which cause signal loss of the urine due to T2* effects. Gadolinium excretory MR urography allows to obtain high-quality images of both nondilated and obstructed urinary tracts in patients with normal or moderately impaired renal function. This article reviews the principles of T2- and T1-weighted MR urography in detail and informs how to use these techniques safely in potential clinical applications such as chronic urolithiasis, intrinsic and extrinsic tumor diseases, and congenital anomalies. Magnetic resonance urography performed in combination with standard MR imaging offers a potential to reduce the need for invasive retrograde pyelography. Although the economic aspect is still problematic, it is obvious that MR urography will continue to increase its role in clinical uroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11288839     DOI: 10.1007/s003300000685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  15 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric uroradiology: state of the art.

Authors:  Kassa Darge; J Damien Grattan-Smith; Michael Riccabona
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-04-21

Review 2.  [Magnetic resonance imaging in urology. Current techniques].

Authors:  G Schneider; R Seidel; P Fries
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  MR urography in children.

Authors:  J Damien Grattan-Smith; Richard A Jones
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-06-22

4.  Artificial hydroureteronephrosis to facilitate MR urography during pregnancy.

Authors:  S S Connolly; L P Browne; C D Collins; G M Lennon
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  MR urography in children: how we do it.

Authors:  J Damien Grattan-Smith; Stephen B Little; Richard A Jones
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-12-11

6.  Magnetic resonance urography vs computed tomography urography in the evaluation of patients with haematuria.

Authors:  Paola Martingano; Marco Francesco M Cavallaro; Michele Bertolotto; Fulvio Stacul; Maja Ukmar; Maria Assunta Cova
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 7.  [MR urography: principles, examination techniques, indications].

Authors:  M Memarsadeghi; M Riccabona; G Heinz-Peer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Magnetic resonance urography for the assessment of potential renal donors: comparison of the RARE technique with a low-dose gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance urography technique in the absence of pharmacological and mechanical intervention.

Authors:  Klaus D Hagspiel; Sabah Butty; Kiran R Nandalur; Eric A Bissonette; Ming-Chen Paul Shih; Daniel A Leung; J Fritz Angle; David J Spinosa; Alan H Matsumoto; Hossam Ahmed; Hilary Sanfey; Ross B Isaacs; Robert G Sawyer; Timothy L Pruett
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Application of magnetic resonance urography in diagnosis of congenital urogenital anomalies in children.

Authors:  Seyedmehdi Payabvash; Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh; Parisa Saeedi; Zhina Sadeghi; Azadeh Elmi; Mehrzad Mehdizadeh
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 10.  Pediatric MRU--its potential and its role in the diagnostic work-up of upper urinary tract dilatation in infants and children.

Authors:  Michael Riccabona
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.