Literature DB >> 15517142

[Magnetic resonance imaging in urology. Current techniques].

G Schneider1, R Seidel, P Fries.   

Abstract

Due to low costs and common availability, ultrasonography and computed tomography still represent the most common diagnostic tools in uroradiology. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is gaining more and more importance since this imaging modality allows for a comprehensive examination of almost the complete spectrum of urologic diseases, including congenital malformations. The most important advantages of MRI are the free choice of slice orientation, high soft tissue contrast and high resolution as well as the lack of radiation. Technical progresses in hard and software components have led to a reduction in acquisition time, allowing for real-time imaging as well as MR angiography and MR urography with a significant reduction in motion artifacts. In addition, contrast enhanced MRI represents the imaging modality of choice in patients with reduced renal function or known allergy against iodinated contrast agent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15517142     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-004-0712-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  15 in total

Review 1.  MR urography today.

Authors:  C C A Nolte-Ernsting; G Staatz; J Tacke; R W Günther
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

2.  MR urography of the ureter.

Authors:  Alfredo Blandino; Michele Gaeta; Fabio Minutoli; Ignazio Salamone; Carlo Magno; Emanuele Scribano; Ignazio Pandolfo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  MR angiography: noninvasive vascular imaging of the abdomen.

Authors:  J P Laissy; H Trillaud; P Douek
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct

4.  Diuretic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance urography versus intravenous urography for depiction of nondilated urinary tracts.

Authors:  T El-Diasty; O Mansour; A Farouk
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

Review 5.  MR imaging of the adrenal glands and kidneys.

Authors:  M Gilfeather; P J Woodward
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.875

Review 6.  Radiologic assessment of renal masses: implications for patient care.

Authors:  A J Davidson; D S Hartman; P L Choyke; B J Wagner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the adrenal gland and kidney.

Authors:  E D Brown; R C Semelka
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1995

Review 8.  Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography: applications for abdominal imaging.

Authors:  J F Glockner
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 9.  MR imaging of renal and adrenal masses in children.

Authors:  M M Bilal; J J Brown
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 10.  Imaging of renal tumours in infancy and childhood.

Authors:  Michael Riccabona
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.