Literature DB >> 11285962

Psychiatric disorders affect outcomes of antireflux operations for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

V Velanovich1, R Karmy-Jones.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most of the information used to determine a patient's candidacy for antireflux surgery has centered on physiologic measurements of esophageal functioning and quantitative assessment of acid reflux. Unfortunately, little attention has been paid to the study of psychosocial factors that could affect outcomes. The purpose of this study was to establish whether concomitant psychiatric disorders might affect the symptomatic outcomes of antireflux surgery.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively gathered database of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who underwent either open or laparoscopic antireflux surgery. A history of a psychiatric disorder was considered to be present if the patient had been previously diagnosed with a DSM-IV psychiatric diagnosis and was being medically treated for it. Preoperatively, patients were evaluated with the symptom severity questionnaire, the GERD-HRQL (best score 0, worst score 50). Later in the series, patients were also evaluated with the generic quality-of-life questionnaire, the SF-36 (best score 100, worst score 0). After antireflux surgery, patients completed both questionnaires 6 weeks postoperatively.
RESULTS: A total of 94 patients underwent antireflux surgery. Seventy-seven of them had laparoscopic antireflux surgery (either Nissen or Toupet fundoplication), and 17 had open antireflux surgery (Nissen, Toupet, Collis-Nissen, or Belsey fundoplications). Nine patients had psychiatric disorders (five major depression, four anxiety disorders). At 6-week follow-up, 95.3% of patients without psychiatric disorders were satisfied with surgery, as compared to 11.1% of patients with psychiatric disorders (p < 0.000001). Patients satisfied with surgery had a median SF-36 mental health domain score of 76, as compared to a score of 36 for patients dissatisfied with surgery (p = 0.0002). Patients without psychiatric disorders showed improvement in the median total GERD-HRQL score from 27 preoperatively to 1 postoperatively (p < 0.000001), whereas patients with psychiatric disorders demonstrated less improvement, from 30 preoperatively to 10.5 postoperatively (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with psychiatric disorders are rarely satisfied with the results of antireflux surgery. Moreover, these patients demonstrated less symptomatic relief than patients without psychiatric disorders. Patients who were dissatisfied with antireflux surgery--even those without psychiatric disorders--had lower scores on the SF-36 mental health domain. These results suggest that even patients who might otherwise be candidates for antireflux surgery may have a poor symptomatic outcome, if they also have low mental health domain scores. Antireflux surgery in patients who suffer from major depression or anxiety disorder should be approached with great trepidation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11285962     DOI: 10.1007/s004640000318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  22 in total

Review 1.  Outpatient physiologic testing and surgical management of foregut motility disorders.

Authors:  H J Stein; T R DeMeester
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 1.909

2.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey.

Authors:  C A McHorney; M Kosinski; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Quality of life scale for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  V Velanovich; S R Vallance; J R Gusz; F V Tapia; M A Harkabus
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  A physiologic approach to laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  J G Hunter; T L Trus; G D Branum; J P Waring; W C Wood
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Comparison of laparoscopic total and partial fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  M G Patti; M Arcerito; J Tong; A Wang; S J Mulvihill; L W Way
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Failure of antireflux surgery: causes and management strategies.

Authors:  H J Stein; H Feussner; J R Siewert
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Evaluation of primary repair in 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  T R DeMeester; L Bonavina; M Albertucci
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Patient satisfaction following laparoscopic and open antireflux surgery.

Authors:  D W Rattner; D C Brooks
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1995-03

10.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology.

Authors:  K R DeVault; D O Castell
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1995-11-13
View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  The impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease on quality of life.

Authors:  T Kamolz; R Pointner; V Velanovich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Preoperative factors predicting clinical outcome following laparoscopic fundoplication.

Authors:  Annina Staehelin; Urs Zingg; Peter G Devitt; Adrian J Esterman; Lorelle Smith; Glyn G Jamieson; David I Watson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Minor psychiatric disorders and objective diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Rafael Melillo Laurino Neto; Fernando A M Herbella; Andre Zugman; Vic Velanovich; Beth Montera; Francisco Schlottmann; Marco G Patti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Impact of psychiatric disorders on patient satisfaction after Nissen Fundoplication.

Authors:  Carla N Holcomb; Noah J Switzer; Anahita Jalilvand; Patricia Belle; Monet McNally; Kyle Perry
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Psychoemotional factors and their influence on the quality of life in patients with GERD.

Authors:  Charles Hill; Yvonne Versluijs; Elisa Furay; Deonna Reese-White; Cole Holan; Jeremiah Alexander; Stephanie Doggett; David Ring; F P Buckley
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Coping strategies, health-related quality of life and psychiatric history in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Authors:  Mathilde Hedlund; Elisabeth Ronne-Engström; Marianne Carlsson; Lisa Ekselius
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  The effect of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication on laryngeal findings and voice quality.

Authors:  F Ogut; S Ersin; E Z Engin; T Kirazli; R Midilli; G Unsal; S Bor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The effect of chronic pain syndromes and psychoemotional disorders on symptomatic and quality-of-life outcomes of antireflux surgery.

Authors:  Vic Velanovich
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Who will fail laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication? Preoperative prediction of long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Craig B Morgenthal; Edward Lin; Matthew D Shane; John G Hunter; C Daniel Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  The use of medication after laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

Authors:  Ruxandra Ciovica; Otto Riedl; Christoph Neumayer; Wolfgang Lechner; Gerhard P Schwab; Michael Gadenstätter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.