M J Postma1, M L Heijnen, J C Jager. 1. Groningen University Institute for Drug Exploration/Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy (GUIDE/GRIP), Groningen, The Netherlands. m.postma@farm.rug.nl
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost effectiveness (net costs per life year gained) of pneumococcal vaccination of elderly individuals aged 65 years and over in The Netherlands. DESIGN AND SETTING: A pharmacoeconomic analysis was conducted from the healthcare perspective in The Netherlands. The gender- and age-specific modelling framework linked epidemiological aspects of invasive pneumococcal disease (e.g. incidence, mortality, life years lost) to vaccination and hospital resource use. To derive 90% confidence limits for net costs per life year gained a stochastic analysis was performed. INTERVENTION: Pneumococcal vaccination in the elderly with the 23-valent vaccine. Effectiveness of the vaccine in preventing invasive pneumococcal disease was derived from international studies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: Pneumococcal vaccination in the elderly was not found to be cost saving. At baseline, stochastic and univariate sensitivity analysis net costs per life year gained were estimated to be between 6000 and 16,000 euro (EUR) [EUR1 = 1.1 US dollars; cost level 1995]. A scenario analysis on alternative age-dependent vaccination strategies indicated even higher net costs per life year gained, up to EUR28,000 for vaccinating only those elderly aged 85 years and over. CONCLUSIONS: Pneumococcal vaccination is associated with net costs per life year gained of EUR10,100 (at baseline assumptions). These costs are higher than those for influenza vaccination (EUR5500). Our pharmacoeconomic approach, which needs to be considered in conjunction with social, psychological and budgetary issues, is intended to contribute to rational decision-making in healthcare policy.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost effectiveness (net costs per life year gained) of pneumococcal vaccination of elderly individuals aged 65 years and over in The Netherlands. DESIGN AND SETTING: A pharmacoeconomic analysis was conducted from the healthcare perspective in The Netherlands. The gender- and age-specific modelling framework linked epidemiological aspects of invasive pneumococcal disease (e.g. incidence, mortality, life years lost) to vaccination and hospital resource use. To derive 90% confidence limits for net costs per life year gained a stochastic analysis was performed. INTERVENTION: Pneumococcal vaccination in the elderly with the 23-valent vaccine. Effectiveness of the vaccine in preventing invasive pneumococcal disease was derived from international studies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS:Pneumococcal vaccination in the elderly was not found to be cost saving. At baseline, stochastic and univariate sensitivity analysis net costs per life year gained were estimated to be between 6000 and 16,000 euro (EUR) [EUR1 = 1.1 US dollars; cost level 1995]. A scenario analysis on alternative age-dependent vaccination strategies indicated even higher net costs per life year gained, up to EUR28,000 for vaccinating only those elderly aged 85 years and over. CONCLUSIONS:Pneumococcal vaccination is associated with net costs per life year gained of EUR10,100 (at baseline assumptions). These costs are higher than those for influenza vaccination (EUR5500). Our pharmacoeconomic approach, which needs to be considered in conjunction with social, psychological and budgetary issues, is intended to contribute to rational decision-making in healthcare policy.
Authors: A J de Neeling; W van Pelt; C Hol; E E Ligtvoet; L J Sabbe; A Bartelds; J D van Embden Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: J E Sisk; A J Moskowitz; W Whang; J D Lin; D S Fedson; A M McBean; J F Plouffe; M S Cetron; J C Butler Journal: JAMA Date: 1997 Oct 22-29 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: A Ortqvist; J Hedlund; L A Burman; E Elbel; M Höfer; M Leinonen; I Lindblad; B Sundelöf; M Kalin Journal: Lancet Date: 1998-02-07 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: P O Honkanen; T Keistinen; L Miettinen; E Herva; U Sankilampi; E Läärä; M Leinonen; S L Kivelä; P H Mäkelä Journal: Vaccine Date: 1999-06-04 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: E D Shapiro; A T Berg; R Austrian; D Schroeder; V Parcells; A Margolis; R K Adair; J D Clemens Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1991-11-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Maarten J Postma; Paul Jansema; Marianne L L van Genugten; Marie-Louise A Heijnen; Johannes C Jager; Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg Journal: Drugs Date: 2002 Impact factor: 9.546
Authors: Jarir Atthobari; Jasper M Bos; Cornelis Boersma; Jacobus R B J Brouwers; Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg; Maarten J Postma Journal: Pharm World Sci Date: 2005-10
Authors: S M A A Evers; A J H A Ament; G L Colombo; H B Konradsen; R R Reinert; D Sauerland; K Wittrup-Jensen; C Loiseau; D S Fedson Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 3.267