Literature DB >> 11283441

Low-volume circuit versus high-volume periodized resistance training in women.

J O Marx1, N A Ratamess, B C Nindl, L A Gotshalk, J S Volek, K Dohi, J A Bush, A L Gómez, S A Mazzetti, S J Fleck, K Häkkinen, R U Newton, W J Kraemer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation was to determine the long-term training adaptations associated with low-volume circuit-type versus periodized high-volume resistance training programs in women.
METHODS: 34 healthy, untrained women were randomly placed into one of the following groups: low-volume, single-set circuit (SSC; N = 12); periodized high-volume multiple-set (MS; N = 12); or nonexercising control (CON) group (N = 10). The SSC group performed one set of 8-12 repetitions to muscular failure 3 d x wk(-1). The MS group performed two to four sets of 3-15 repetitions with periodized volume and intensity 4 d x wk(-1). Muscular strength, power, speed, endurance, anthropometry, and resting hormonal concentrations were determined pretraining (T1), after 12 wk (T2), and after 24 wk of training (T3).
RESULTS: 1-RM bench press and leg press, and upper and lower body local muscular endurance increased significantly (P < or = 0.05) at T2 for both groups, but only MS showed a significant increase at T3. Muscular power and speed increased significantly at T2 and T3 only for MS. Increases in testosterone were observed for both groups at T2 but only MS showed a significant increase at T3. Cortisol decreased from T1 to T2 and from T2 to T3 in MS. Insulin-like growth factor-1 increased significantly at T3 for SSC and at T2 and T3 for MS. No changes were observed for growth hormone in any of the training groups.
CONCLUSION: Significant improvements in muscular performance may be attained with either a low-volume single-set program or a high-volume, periodized multiple-set program during the first 12 wk of training in untrained women. However, dramatically different training adaptations are associated with specific domains of training program design which contrast in speed of movement, exercise choices and use of variation (periodization) in the intensity and volume of exercise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11283441     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200104000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  47 in total

Review 1.  Berger in retrospect: effect of varied weight training programmes on strength.

Authors:  R N Carpinelli
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Circulating androgens in women: exercise-induced changes.

Authors:  Carina Enea; Nathalie Boisseau; Marie Agnès Fargeas-Gluck; Véronique Diaz; Benoit Dugué
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Possible stimuli for strength and power adaptation: acute mechanical responses.

Authors:  Blair Crewther; John Cronin; Justin Keogh
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Resistance training for performance and injury prevention in golf.

Authors:  Gregory J Lehman
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2006-03

5.  High-volume resistance training session acutely diminishes respiratory muscle strength.

Authors:  Daniel A Hackett; Nathan A Johnson; Chin-Moi Chow
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Acute effects of three different circuit weight training protocols on blood lactate, heart rate, and rating of perceived exertion in recreationally active women.

Authors:  Brook L Skidmore; Margaret T Jones; Mark Blegen; Tracey D Matthews
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 7.  Periodization: Variation in the Definition and Discrepancies in Study Design.

Authors:  Ryo Kataoka; Ecaterina Vasenina; Jeremy Loenneke; Samuel L Buckner
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 8.  Comparison of Periodized and Non-Periodized Resistance Training on Maximal Strength: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tyler D Williams; Danilo V Tolusso; Michael V Fedewa; Michael R Esco
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Urinary steroid profile after the completion of concentric and concentric/eccentric trials with the same total workload.

Authors:  R Timon; G Olcina; P Tomas-Carus; D Muñoz; F Toribio; A Raimundo; M Maynar
Journal:  J Physiol Biochem       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.158

10.  Resistance training volume, energy balance and weight management: rationale and design of a 9 month trial.

Authors:  Richard A Washburn; Joseph E Donnelly; Bryan K Smith; Debra K Sullivan; Janet Marquis; Stephen D Herrmann
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.