Literature DB >> 11281883

Patient expectations and health-related quality of life.

Sophie Staniszewska1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQL) has become increasingly common in health services research. Whilst useful, its focus on behaviour, capacities and activities means that it remains relatively specific. This paper explores the possibility of extending the evaluation of health by considering the concept of patients' expectations.
DESIGN: In-depth and semi-structured interviews were used to explore the concept of expectations from the patients' perspective. Patients' expectations were then used in the construction of a two-part questionnaire. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Expectations were explored with a group of 33 cardiac patients. The resulting questionnaire was given to 400 cardiac patients in a large teaching hospital in London.
RESULTS: Patients identified a range of expectations which related to their health and seemed to represent the desired results of their hospital stay. Comparison of the content of patient expectations with a commonly used generic measure of HRQL, the Short-Form 36 (SF-36), found some overlap but indicated that patients seemed to adopt a broader approach to their health. Expectations that patients identified were used to construct two scales to measure expectations and their evaluation. The internal consistency of these scales was 0.82 and 0.88, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The study indicates the potential complexity of the concept of expectations and the need for further exploration. It also demonstrates the feasibility of constructing standardized scales to measure patient expectations. Whilst conceptually different from HRQL such standardized expectations scales could provide a useful adjunct to HRQL measurement and provide a meaningful context for the interpretation of HRQL data.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 11281883      PMCID: PMC5061446          DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1999.00046.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  26 in total

Review 1.  The patient satisfaction process: moving toward a comprehensive model.

Authors:  S Strasser; L Aharony; D Greenberger
Journal:  Med Care Rev       Date:  1993

Review 2.  Rigour and qualitative research.

Authors:  N Mays; C Pope
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-08

Review 3.  Expectations as determinants of patient satisfaction: concepts, theory and evidence.

Authors:  A G Thompson; R Suñol
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.038

4.  Tacit models of disability underlying health status instruments.

Authors:  S Ziebland; R Fitzpatrick; C Jenkinson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Quality of life in cancer patients--an hypothesis.

Authors:  K C Calman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Patient satisfaction: a valid concept?

Authors:  B Williams
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 7.  What do general practitioners and their patients want from general practice and are they receiving it? A framework.

Authors:  S A Buetow
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Problems in the conceptual framework of patient satisfaction research: an empirical exploration.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; A Hopkins
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  1983-11

9.  Individual quality of life in patients undergoing hip replacement.

Authors:  C A O'Boyle; H McGee; A Hickey; K O'Malley; C R Joyce
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-05-02       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Toward a theory of patient satisfaction.

Authors:  S U Linder-Pelz
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  3 in total

1.  Expecting a good quality of life in health: assessing people with diverse diseases and conditions using the WHOQOL-BREF.

Authors:  Suzanne M Skevington; Farah M McCrate
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  The CASP-19 as a measure of quality of life in old age: evaluation of its use in a retirement community.

Authors:  Julius Sim; Bernadette Bartlam; Miriam Bernard
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Measuring outcomes in trials of interventions for people who self-harm: qualitative study of service users' views.

Authors:  Christabel Owens; Fiona Fox; Sabi Redwood; Rosemary Davies; Lisa Foote; Naomi Salisbury; Salena Williams; Lucy Biddle; Kyla Thomas
Journal:  BJPsych Open       Date:  2020-02-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.