Literature DB >> 11281108

A comparison of tactile spatial sensitivity on the palm and fingerpad.

J C Craig1, K B Lyle.   

Abstract

Studies of tactile spatial pattern perception have, for the most part, been carried out using the fingerpad. On the basis of these studies, models have been developed linking spatial pattern identification and resolution with underlying neural structures. It has been suggested that with appropriate scaling, these models would apply to the processing of spatial patterns presented to other sites on the body. Spatial sensitivity was examined on another site on the body, the palm, using two measures, letter identification and grating orientation. The results from these measures were compared with results from similar studies conducted on the fingerpad and with estimates of the density of innervation of the fingerpad and palm. To produce levels of performance similar to those on the fingerpad required letters on the palm 50 mm in height, seven to nine times larger than those used on the fingerpad. Gratings had to be six to more than seven times larger on the palm to produce the same levels of performance achieved on the fingerpad. For the two types of receptor systems sensitive to spatial information, the ratio of density of innervation between the fingerpad and the palm is estimated to be 5.7:1 and 8.8:1. Performance of spatial tasks on the palm can be predicted quantitatively from fingerpad data with a moderate degree of accuracy. Qualitative comparisons between the palm and fingerpad data indicate that spatial patterns are processed similarly at the two sites.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11281108     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  10 in total

1.  The effect of force and conformance on tactile intensive and spatial sensitivity.

Authors:  Gregory O Gibson; James C Craig
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Grasp posture alters visual processing biases near the hands.

Authors:  Laura E Thomas
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-04-10

3.  Effects of tendon vibration and age on force reproduction task performed with wrist flexors.

Authors:  Mélanie Henry; Alp Eşrefoğlu; Jacques Duchateau; Stéphane Baudry
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Retention of high tactile acuity throughout the life span in blindness.

Authors:  Gordon E Legge; Cindee Madison; Brenna N Vaughn; Allen M Y Cheong; Joseph C Miller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-11

5.  Discriminating smooth from grooved surfaces: effects of random variations in skin penetration.

Authors:  James C Craig; Roger P Rhodes; Gregory O Gibson; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Sensory and Emotional Perception of Wooden Surfaces through Fingertip Touch.

Authors:  Shiv R Bhatta; Kaisa Tiippana; Katja Vahtikari; Mark Hughes; Marketta Kyttä
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-13

7.  Tactile Detection in Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tania Augière; Audrey Desjardins; Emmanuelle Paquette Raynard; Clémentine Brun; Anne Marie Pinard; Martin Simoneau; Catherine Mercier
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-24

8.  Grasp posture modulates attentional prioritization of space near the hands.

Authors:  Laura E Thomas
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-31

9.  Skin-inspired highly stretchable and conformable matrix networks for multifunctional sensing.

Authors:  Qilin Hua; Junlu Sun; Haitao Liu; Rongrong Bao; Ruomeng Yu; Junyi Zhai; Caofeng Pan; Zhong Lin Wang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Sensory restoration by epidural stimulation of the lateral spinal cord in upper-limb amputees.

Authors:  Santosh Chandrasekaran; Ameya C Nanivadekar; Gina McKernan; Eric R Helm; Michael L Boninger; Jennifer L Collinger; Robert A Gaunt; Lee E Fisher
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 8.140

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.