Literature DB >> 11277165

Improving adherence to abnormal Pap smear follow-up.

P D Abercrombie1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To gain a better understanding of factors that affect follow-up and the strategies that have been found to improve follow-up after an abnormal Papanicolaou (Pap) smear test. DATA SOURCES: A computer-based search of the literature was conducted using MEDLINE with the keywords adherence, nonadherence, compliance, follow-up, and abnormal Pap smears. STUDY SELECTION: Research studies published between 1985 and 1999 in the English language were included. If relevant studies were cited in the articles reviewed, these studies also were reviewed. A total of 25 studies were reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION: A critical review of these studies was conducted, with special attention to implications for clinical practice as well as future research. The studies fell into two groups: factors associated with nonadherence and strategies developed to improve adherence. DATA SYNTHESIS: A number of factors were identified that affect adherence to follow-up among women with abnormal Pap smears. Some of these factors involve characteristics of the woman, such as demographics, social support, lack of understanding, and fear. Factors that pertain to the health care system, such as inconvenient clinic hours, male providers, and insensitive staff, also were identified. A number of strategies have been successful in improving follow-up, including telephone counseling, educational programs, and economic incentives.
CONCLUSIONS: Nurses play a crucial role in facilitating adherence to recommendations for follow-up. They can identify women at risk for poor follow-up, increase awareness of the factors that affect follow-up, and implement strategies shown to be successful in improving adherence. Future research should take into account the multifactoral nature of adherence as well as the patient's perspective. In addition, studies should be designed with special attention to generalizability and should include women from populations most at risk for cervical cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11277165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs        ISSN: 0090-0311


  12 in total

Review 1.  Factors in quality care--the case of follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests--problems in the steps and interfaces of care.

Authors:  Jane Zapka; Stephen H Taplin; Rebecca Anhang Price; Caroline Cranos; Robin Yabroff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

2.  Determinants of adequate follow-up of an abnormal Papanicolaou result among Jamaican women in Portland, Jamaica.

Authors:  Su Jin Jeong; Ekta Saroha; Jeremy Knight; Michele Roofe; Pauline E Jolly
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Tailored telephone counseling to improve adherence to follow-up regimens after an abnormal pap smear among minority, underserved women.

Authors:  Suzanne M Miller; Siu-kuen Azor Hui; Kuang-Yi Wen; John Scarpato; Fang Zhu; Joanne Buzaglo; Enrique E Hernandez
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-08-19

4.  Closing the cervical cancer disparity gap.

Authors:  Patricia J Kelly; Megha Ramaswamy
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.462

Review 5.  Monitoring drug adherence.

Authors:  Sarah R Lieber; Jacqueline Helcer; Eyal Shemesh
Journal:  Transplant Rev (Orlando)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.943

6.  Psychosocial barriers to follow-up adherence after an abnormal cervical cytology test result among low-income, inner-city women.

Authors:  Siu-Kuen Azor Hui; Suzanne M Miller; Kuang-Yi Wen; Zhu Fang; Tianyu Li; Joanne Buzaglo; Enrique Hernandez
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2014-04-09

7.  Challenges to Pap Smear Follow-up among Women in the Criminal Justice System.

Authors:  Patricia J Kelly; Jennifer Hunter; Elizabeth Brett Daily; Megha Ramaswamy
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-02

8.  Patient barriers to follow-up care for breast and cervical cancer abnormalities.

Authors:  Silvia Tejeda; Julie S Darnell; Young I Cho; Melinda R Stolley; Talar W Markossian; Elizabeth A Calhoun
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Three-year follow-up study of women who participated in a cervical cancer screening intervention while in prison.

Authors:  Ruth Elwood Martin; T Gregory Hislop; Veronika Moravan; Garry D Grams; Betty Calam
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug

10.  Family planning provider referral, facilitation behavior, and patient follow-up for abnormal Pap smears.

Authors:  Holly C Felix; Janet Bronstein; Zoran Bursac; M Kathryn Stewart; H Russell Foushee; Joshua Klapow
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.