OBJECTIVE: The present study explored the impact of a tailored telephone counseling intervention on increasing follow-up adherence after an abnormal Pap smear result among low-income, minority women, which may reduce cervical cancer disparity. METHODS:Participants (N=211) were randomly assigned to receive: (1) a telephone reminder that included an assessment of barriers to adherence, as well as counseling tailored to the barriers elicited; (2) telephone reminder and barriers assessment, followed by a mailed home tailored barriers print brochure; or (3) enhanced standard care comprising telephone reminder and barriers assessment. Assessments were obtained at initial contact and 1-week later, as well as at 6- and 12-months after the initial colposcopy. RESULTS: The telephone counseling group showed greater adherence to follow-up recommendations than did the combined other two groups (p<0.05). For the initial colposcopy, tailored telephone barriers counseling was more effective among women with a high school education or less. CONCLUSION: Tailored telephone barriers counseling improves adherence to initial colposcopy, as well as to longer-term medical follow-up, among low-income, inner-city women. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Dissemination of barriers counseling into ongoing telephone reminder calls and contacts may decrease disparities in cancer outcomes, especially among women with less than post-secondary education.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The present study explored the impact of a tailored telephone counseling intervention on increasing follow-up adherence after an abnormal Pap smear result among low-income, minority women, which may reduce cervical cancer disparity. METHODS:Participants (N=211) were randomly assigned to receive: (1) a telephone reminder that included an assessment of barriers to adherence, as well as counseling tailored to the barriers elicited; (2) telephone reminder and barriers assessment, followed by a mailed home tailored barriers print brochure; or (3) enhanced standard care comprising telephone reminder and barriers assessment. Assessments were obtained at initial contact and 1-week later, as well as at 6- and 12-months after the initial colposcopy. RESULTS: The telephone counseling group showed greater adherence to follow-up recommendations than did the combined other two groups (p<0.05). For the initial colposcopy, tailored telephone barriers counseling was more effective among women with a high school education or less. CONCLUSION: Tailored telephone barriers counseling improves adherence to initial colposcopy, as well as to longer-term medical follow-up, among low-income, inner-city women. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Dissemination of barriers counseling into ongoing telephone reminder calls and contacts may decrease disparities in cancer outcomes, especially among women with less than post-secondary education.
Authors: Kathleen Ell; Betsy Vourlekis; Laila Muderspach; Jan Nissly; Deborah Padgett; Diana Pineda; Olga Sarabia; Pey-Jiuan Lee Journal: J Womens Health Gend Based Med Date: 2002-09
Authors: Susan Hariri; Elizabeth R Unger; Maya Sternberg; Eileen F Dunne; David Swan; Sonya Patel; Lauri E Markowitz Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2011-08-15 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Sara E Forhan; Sami L Gottlieb; Maya R Sternberg; Fujie Xu; S Deblina Datta; Geraldine M McQuillan; Stuart M Berman; Lauri E Markowitz Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2009-11-23 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Kristen J Wells; Tracy A Battaglia; Donald J Dudley; Roland Garcia; Amanda Greene; Elizabeth Calhoun; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Electra D Paskett; Peter C Raich Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Thomas C Wright; L Stewart Massad; Charles J Dunton; Mark Spitzer; Edward J Wilkinson; Diane Solomon Journal: J Low Genit Tract Dis Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: Electra D Paskett; Katherine W Reeves; John M McLaughlin; Mira L Katz; Ann Scheck McAlearney; Mack T Ruffin; Chanita Hughes Halbert; Cristina Merete; Faith Davis; Sarah Gehlert Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2008-07-31 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Anita Y Kinney; Rachel Howell; Rachel Ruckman; Jean A McDougall; Tawny W Boyce; Belinda Vicuña; Ji-Hyun Lee; Dolores D Guest; Randi Rycroft; Patricia A Valverde; Kristina M Gallegos; Angela Meisner; Charles L Wiggins; Antoinette Stroup; Lisa E Paddock; Scott T Walters Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-09-18 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Heather M Johnson; Lisa Sullivan-Vedder; KyungMann Kim; Patrick E McBride; Maureen A Smith; Jamie N LaMantia; Jennifer T Fink; Megan R Knutson Sinaise; Laura M Zeller; Diane R Lauver Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2019-01-21 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Siu-Kuen Azor Hui; Suzanne M Miller; Kuang-Yi Wen; Zhu Fang; Tianyu Li; Joanne Buzaglo; Enrique Hernandez Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2014-04-09
Authors: Maria Sansoni; Erin K Tagai; Emmanuel Lapitan; Kuang-Yi Wen; Jenny Xu; Andrew Belfiglio; Shawna V Hudson; Racquel E Kohler; Enrique Hernandez; Suzanne M Miller Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2022-03-25 Impact factor: 2.532
Authors: Natalia Campacci; Juliana O de Lima; André L Carvalho; Rodrigo D Michelli; Rafael Haikel; Edmundo Mauad; Danilo V Viana; Matias E Melendez; Fabiana de L Vazquez; Cleyton Zanardo; Rui M Reis; Benedito M Rossi; Edenir I Palmero Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2017-10-21 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Chelsea Anderson; LaHoma Smith Romocki; Andrea Des Marais; Leslie Cofie; Theresa Curington; Jennifer Susan Smith Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2019-08-06