BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass on the beating heart has undergone resurgence with the introduction of minimally invasive techniques and new stabilizing devices. It is important to develop a method for training surgeons to perform accurate anastomoses despite cardiac motion and to develop the skills needed for consistent results in this demanding field. METHODS: A prosthetic model of the beating heart was created by Limbs and Things, Ltd. (Bristol, UK) and used in our center to simulate clinical situations of beating heart surgery. Anastomotic quality was evaluated using a pre-established set of criteria on patency and suturing with each anastomosis graded on a 12-point scale. RESULTS: The average scores for trainees using the Pulsatile Beating Heart Model were 8.5 while that of the expert surgeon with MIDCAB experience was 11. Defects seen included cross-wall suturing and significant narrowing of the toe of the anastomosis. Scores improved with increasing practice during each session. Operators with more clinical experience scored higher. All surgeons felt the model duplicated the exposure and feel of the tissue characteristic of clinical cases. CONCLUSIONS: The beating heart simulator provides excellent training for new as well as experienced surgeons, provides visual feedback of anastomotic errors, and instills increasing confidence in the participants in their ability to construct accurate anastomoses on the beating heart.
BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass on the beating heart has undergone resurgence with the introduction of minimally invasive techniques and new stabilizing devices. It is important to develop a method for training surgeons to perform accurate anastomoses despite cardiac motion and to develop the skills needed for consistent results in this demanding field. METHODS: A prosthetic model of the beating heart was created by Limbs and Things, Ltd. (Bristol, UK) and used in our center to simulate clinical situations of beating heart surgery. Anastomotic quality was evaluated using a pre-established set of criteria on patency and suturing with each anastomosis graded on a 12-point scale. RESULTS: The average scores for trainees using the Pulsatile Beating Heart Model were 8.5 while that of the expert surgeon with MIDCAB experience was 11. Defects seen included cross-wall suturing and significant narrowing of the toe of the anastomosis. Scores improved with increasing practice during each session. Operators with more clinical experience scored higher. All surgeons felt the model duplicated the exposure and feel of the tissue characteristic of clinical cases. CONCLUSIONS: The beating heart simulator provides excellent training for new as well as experienced surgeons, provides visual feedback of anastomotic errors, and instills increasing confidence in the participants in their ability to construct accurate anastomoses on the beating heart.
Authors: Carina Hopfner; Andre Jakob; Anja Tengler; Maximilian Grab; Nikolaus Thierfelder; Barbara Brunner; Alisa Thierij; Nikolaus A Haas Journal: 3D Print Med Date: 2021-08-31
Authors: Miguel Angel Maluf; Walter José Gomes; Ademir Massarico Bras; Thiago Cavalcante Vila Nova de Araújo; André Lupp Mota; Caio Cesar Cardoso; Rafael Viana dos S Coutinho Journal: Braz J Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2015 Sep-Oct
Authors: James I Fann; John H Calhoon; Andrea J Carpenter; Walter H Merrill; John W Brown; Robert S Poston; Maziyar Kalani; Gordon F Murray; George L Hicks; Richard H Feins Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2009-10-28 Impact factor: 5.209