Literature DB >> 11276093

Implications of bulk motion for diffusion-weighted imaging experiments: effects, mechanisms, and solutions.

D G Norris1.   

Abstract

This review article describes the effect of bulk motion on diffusion-weighted imaging experiments, and examines methods for correcting the resulting artifacts. The emphasis throughout the article is on two-dimensional imaging of the brain. The effects of translational and rotational motion on the MR signal are described, and the literature concerning pulsatile brain motion is examined. Methods for ameliorating motion effects are divided into three generic categories. The first is methods that should be intrinsically insensitive to macroscopic motion. These include motion-compensated diffusion-weighting schemes, single-shot EPI, projection reconstruction, and line scanning. Of these, only single-shot EPI and projection reconstruction methods can obtain high-quality images without compromising on sensitivity. The second category of methods is those that can be made insensitive to bulk motion. The methods examined here are FLASH and RARE. It is shown that for both sequences motion insensitivity is in general attained only at the cost of a 50% reduction in sensitivity. The final set of methods examined are those that correct for motion, primarily navigator echoes. The properties and limitations of the navigator echo approach are presented, as are those of methods which attempt to correct the acquired data by minimizing image artifacts. The review concludes with a short summary in which the current status of diffusion imaging in the presence of bulk motion is examined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11276093     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  25 in total

1.  Bulk motion-independent analyses of water diffusion changes in the brain during the cardiac cycle.

Authors:  Tomoya Nakamura; Tosiaki Miyati; Harumasa Kasai; Naoki Ohno; Masato Yamada; Mitsuhito Mase; Masaki Hara; Yuta Shibamoto; Yuriko Suzuki; Katsuhiro Ichikawa
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2009-04-23

2.  Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement in a moving phantom simulating linear respiratory motion.

Authors:  Thomas C Kwee; Taro Takahara; Isao Muro; Marc Van Cauteren; Yutaka Imai; Rutger A J Nievelstein; Willem P T M Mali; Peter R Luijten
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Assessing the performance of different DTI motion correction strategies in the presence of EPI distortion correction.

Authors:  Paul A Taylor; A Alhamud; Andre van der Kouwe; Muhammad G Saleh; Barbara Laughton; Ernesta Meintjes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Optimized Diffusion-Weighting Gradient Waveform Design (ODGD) formulation for motion compensation and concomitant gradient nulling.

Authors:  Óscar Peña-Nogales; Yuxin Zhang; Xiaoke Wang; Rodrigo de Luis-Garcia; Santiago Aja-Fernández; James H Holmes; Diego Hernando
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  A preliminary study of the effects of trigger timing on diffusion tensor imaging of the human spinal cord.

Authors:  P Summers; P Staempfli; T Jaermann; S Kwiecinski; S Kollias
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Diffusion tensor imaging of the brain.

Authors:  Andrew L Alexander; Jee Eun Lee; Mariana Lazar; Aaron S Field
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.620

7.  Head injury or head motion? Assessment and quantification of motion artifacts in diffusion tensor imaging studies.

Authors:  Josef Ling; Flannery Merideth; Arvind Caprihan; Amanda Pena; Terri Teshiba; Andrew R Mayer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 8.  Clinical applications for diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Christina Tsien; Yue Cao; Thomas Chenevert
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.934

9.  Is low b-factors-based apparent diffusion coefficient helpful in assessing renal dysfunction?

Authors:  Jiule Ding; Jie Chen; Zhenxing Jiang; Hua Zhou; Jia Di; Shijun Xing; Wei Xing
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 10.  Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging for staging malignant lymphoma in children.

Authors:  Thomas C Kwee; Taro Takahara; Malou A Vermoolen; Marc B Bierings; Willem P Mali; Rutger A J Nievelstein
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.