Literature DB >> 11275886

Efficacy of high-level disinfectants for reprocessing GI endoscopes in simulated-use testing.

R L Foliente1, B J Kovacs, R M Aprecio, H J Bains, J D Kettering, Y K Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been recent public concern regarding the adequacy of current practices for flexible endoscope reprocessing. High-level disinfection is defined by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a minimum of 6-log reduction of mycobacteria under a worst-case scenario. Several agents are currently approved by the FDA, but published data on their relative efficacies against mycobacteria are lacking. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of these agents for high-level disinfection.
METHODS: In simulated-use testing, video endoscopes (5 colonoscopes and 5 duodenoscopes) were each inoculated with 9.0 x 10(7) colony-forming units of Mycobacterium chelonae. Cleaning was performed by using a standardized protocol. Each endoscope was then subjected to chemical disinfection with Cidex (2.0% glutaraldehyde) at 20 degrees C for 20 minutes, Sporox (7.5% hydrogen peroxide) at 20 degrees for 30 minutes, and Steris 20 (0.2% peracetic acid) at 50 degrees C to 56 degrees C for 12 minutes using the Steris System 1 processor. Although not FDA-approved, tests were also conducted by using 70% isopropyl alcohol at 20 degrees C for 20 minutes. These results were compared with disinfection with ethylene oxide gas. All channels were sampled for M chelonae before and after manual cleaning and after disinfection.
RESULTS: Cleaning alone resulted in an average log reduction of 3. Cidex, Sporox, Steris 20, ethylene oxide gas, and isopropyl alcohol, in combination with manual cleaning, each achieved a 6-log or greater reduction of the mycobacterial inoculum. No organisms were recovered from any channel after reprocessing with ethylene oxide and Steris 20.
CONCLUSIONS: Commercially available high-level disinfectants are equally efficacious for reprocessing flexible GI endoscopes when used in conjunction with cleaning and in accordance with recommended guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11275886     DOI: 10.1067/mge.2001.113380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  8 in total

1.  Current GI endoscope disinfection and QA practices.

Authors:  Frank M Moses; Jennifer S Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Results of gastroscope bacterial decontamination by enzymatic detergent compared to chlorhexidine.

Authors:  Rungsun Rerknimitr; Sorapat Eakthunyasakul; Pongpan Nunthapisud; Pradermchai Kongkam
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Is peracetic acid suitable for the cleaning step of reprocessing flexible endoscopes?

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Patricia M Fliss; Heike Martiny
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-09-16

Review 4.  Duodenoscope-Associated Bacterial Infections: A Review and Update.

Authors:  Jennifer T Higa; Michael Gluck; Andrew S Ross
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06

5.  Effect of Disinfectants on Mechanical Properties of Orthodontic Acrylics.

Authors:  Tobias Bensel; Jens J Bock; Anne Kebernik; Christin Arnold; Sonia Mansour; Arne F Boeckler
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2019-04-24

Review 6.  The role of disinfectants and sanitizers during COVID-19 pandemic: advantages and deleterious effects on humans and the environment.

Authors:  Kuldeep Dhama; Shailesh Kumar Patel; Rakesh Kumar; Rupali Masand; Jigyasa Rana; Mohd Iqbal Yatoo; Ruchi Tiwari; Khan Sharun; Ranjan K Mohapatra; Senthilkumar Natesan; Manish Dhawan; Tauseef Ahmad; Talha Bin Emran; Yashpal Singh Malik; Harapan Harapan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 7.  Efficacy and effectiveness of alcohol in the disinfection of semi-critical materials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maíra Marques Ribeiro; Verena Ashley Neumann; Maria Clara Padoveze; Kazuko Uchikawa Graziano
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

Review 8.  A narrative review on current duodenoscope reprocessing techniques and novel developments.

Authors:  Maarten Heuvelmans; Herman F Wunderink; Henny C van der Mei; Jan F Monkelbaan
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.887

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.