Literature DB >> 11275283

Effects of cholinergic manipulation on operant delayed non-matching to position performance in two inbred strains of mice.

N Estapé1, T Steckler.   

Abstract

With the increasing demand on phenotyping of mouse mutants there is a clear need to develop novel paradigms for testing mice. Mice are able to learn a non-matching to position rule to high accuracy in a variety of maze paradigms, but an operant version of this task is desirable. In the present study, mice of the C57BL/6 and DBA/2 strains were trained and tested on an operant delayed non-matching to position (DNMTP) paradigm. Data were analysed according to the methods of signal detection theory (SDT), which allows conclusions as to whether strain differences in DNMTP performance are more related to changes in accuracy or in motivational factors. Mice can learn to respond on an operant DNMTP paradigm with high accuracy, and accurate performance depends on the duration of the delay-period, i.e. forgetting curves can be generated. Comparison between the two strains of mice revealed that DBA/2 mice learned faster than C57BL/6 mice to associate the lever press with food during initial shaping, but no further strain differences were observed in accurate responding during later stages of the experiment. However, differences in biased responding and, in particular, responsivity were observed between the two strains. Muscarinic blockade with scopolamine (0.1--1.0 mg/kg) failed to affect accuracy in the two strains, but altered responsivity. This task should be of great value for a more in-depth analysis of cognitive function in mutant mice as it allows a better dissociation between mnemonic and non-mnemonic factors. In particular, such paradigm may be of interest for testing conditional mutants, which allow time-sensitive induction or inhibition of gene expression, i.e. where animals can be trained while non-impaired to stable baseline and then tested once the gene is activated or inhibited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11275283     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(00)00379-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  8 in total

Review 1.  The NEWMEDS rodent touchscreen test battery for cognition relevant to schizophrenia.

Authors:  M Hvoslef-Eide; A C Mar; S R O Nilsson; J Alsiö; C J Heath; L M Saksida; T W Robbins; T J Bussey
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Performance of C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice on a touchscreen-based attentional set-shifting task.

Authors:  Price E Dickson; Michele A Calton; Guy Mittleman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  A quantitative analysis of the effects of qualitatively different reinforcers on fixed ratio responding in inbred strains of mice.

Authors:  Blake A Hutsell; M Christopher Newland
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 2.877

4.  Effects of ethanol and GABAB drugs on working memory in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice.

Authors:  T Escher; G Mittleman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-04-03       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Loss of hippocampal function impairs pattern separation on a mouse touch-screen operant paradigm.

Authors:  Megan Josey; Jonathan L Brigman
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 2.877

6.  Executive functions in agenesis of the corpus callosum: Working memory and sustained attention in the BTBR inbred mouse strain.

Authors:  Loren A Martin; Fang-Wei Hsu; Brooke Herd; Michael Gregg; Hannah Sample; Jason Kaplan
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 2.708

7.  Working memory and pattern separation in founder strains of the BXD recombinant inbred mouse panel.

Authors:  Price E Dickson; Guy Mittleman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  The utilisation of operant delayed matching and non-matching to position for probing cognitive flexibility and working memory in mouse models of Huntington's disease.

Authors:  Emma Yhnell; Stephen B Dunnett; Simon P Brooks
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.