Literature DB >> 11274839

General practitioners' willingness to request plain lumbar spine radiographic examinations.

O P Ryynänen1, J Lehtovirta, S Soimakallio, J Takala.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine general practitioners' attitudes to plain lumbar spine radiographic examinations.
DESIGN: A postal questionnaire consisting of questions on background data and doctors' opinions about plain lumbar spine radiographic examinations, as well as eight vignettes (imaginary patient cases) presenting indications for lumbar radiography, and five vignettes focusing on the doctors' willingness to request lumbar radiography on the basis of patients' age and duration of symptoms. The data were analysed according to the doctor's age, sex, workplace and the medical school of graduation.
SETTING: Finland.
SUBJECTS: Six hundred and fifteen randomly selected physicians working in primary health care (64% of original target group).
RESULTS: The vignettes revealed that the use of plain lumbar radiographic examination varied between 26 and 88%. Patient's age and radiation protection were the most prominent factors influencing doctors' decisions to request lumbar radiographies. Only slight differences were observed between the attitudes of male and female doctors, as well as between young and older doctors. Doctors' willingness to request lumbar radiographies increased with the patient's age in most vignettes. The duration of patients' symptoms had a dramatic effect on the doctor's decision: in all vignettes, doctors were more likely to request lumbar radiography when patient's symptoms had exceeded 4 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: General practitioners commonly use plain lumbar spine radiographic examinations, despite its limited value in the diagnosis of low back pain. Further consensus and medical education is needed to clarify the indications for plain lumbar radiographic examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11274839     DOI: 10.1016/s0720-048x(00)00234-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  6 in total

1.  Radiologists' responses to inadequate referrals.

Authors:  Kristin Bakke Lysdahl; Bjørn Morten Hofmann; Ansgar Espeland
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Randomized controlled trial of education and feedback for implementation of guidelines for acute low back pain.

Authors:  Joel M Schectman; W Scott Schroth; Dante Verme; John D Voss
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Identifying factors likely to influence compliance with diagnostic imaging guideline recommendations for spine disorders among chiropractors in North America: a focus group study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Authors:  André E Bussières; Andrea M Patey; Jill J Francis; Anne E Sales; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Melissa Brouwers; Gaston Godin; Jan Hux; Marie Johnston; Louise Lemyre; Marie-Pascale Pomey; Anne Sales; Merrick Zwarenstein
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Explaining variation in GP referral rates for x-rays for back pain.

Authors:  Rachel Baker; Jan Lecouturier; Senga Bond
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Plain lumbosacral X-rays for low back pain: Findings correlate with clinical presentation in primary care settings.

Authors:  Mohammed AlAteeq; Abdelelah A Alseraihi; Abdulaziz A Alhussaini; Sultan A Binhasan; Emad A Ahmari
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-12-31

6.  Factors affecting general practitioners' decisions about plain radiography for back pain: implications for classification of guideline barriers--a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ansgar Espeland; Anders Baerheim
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-03-24       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.