Literature DB >> 11274442

Visual habit formation in monkeys with neurotoxic lesions of the ventrocaudal neostriatum.

J Fernandez-Ruiz1, J Wang, T G Aigner, M Mishkin.   

Abstract

Visual habit formation in monkeys, assessed by concurrent visual discrimination learning with 24-h intertrial intervals (ITI), was found earlier to be impaired by removal of the inferior temporal visual area (TE) but not by removal of either the medial temporal lobe or inferior prefrontal convexity, two of TE's major projection targets. To assess the role in this form of learning of another pair of structures to which TE projects, namely the rostral portion of the tail of the caudate nucleus and the overlying ventrocaudal putamen, we injected a neurotoxin into this neostriatal region of several monkeys and tested them on the 24-h ITI task as well as on a test of visual recognition memory. Compared with unoperated monkeys, the experimental animals were unaffected on the recognition test but showed an impairment on the 24-h ITI task that was highly correlated with the extent of their neostriatal damage. The findings suggest that TE and its projection areas in the ventrocaudal neostriatum form part of a circuit that selectively mediates visual habit formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11274442      PMCID: PMC31202          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.061022098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  52 in total

1.  Connections of inferior temporal areas TEO and TE with parietal and frontal cortex in macaque monkeys.

Authors:  M J Webster; J Bachevalier; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Behavioral effects of selective ablation of the caudate nucleus.

Authors:  I Divac; H E Rosvold; M K Szwarcbart
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1967-04

3.  Long-term effects of selective neonatal temporal lobe lesions on learning and memory in monkeys.

Authors:  L Málková; M Mishkin; J Bachevalier
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Subcortical connections of inferior temporal areas TE and TEO in macaque monkeys.

Authors:  M J Webster; J Bachevalier; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Effects on visual recognition of combined and separate ablations of the entorhinal and perirhinal cortex in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  M Meunier; J Bachevalier; M Mishkin; E A Murray
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Memory for spatial locations, motor responses, and objects: triple dissociation among the hippocampus, caudate nucleus, and extrastriate visual cortex.

Authors:  R P Kesner; B L Bolland; M Dakis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Corticostriatal connections of extrastriate visual areas in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  E H Yeterian; D N Pandya
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1995-02-13       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices of the macaque monkey: cortical afferents.

Authors:  W A Suzuki; D G Amaral
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1994-12-22       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Neural substrates of visual stimulus-stimulus association in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  E A Murray; D Gaffan; M Mishkin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Lesions of the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices in the monkey produce long-lasting memory impairment in the visual and tactual modalities.

Authors:  W A Suzuki; S Zola-Morgan; L R Squire; D G Amaral
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  53 in total

1.  Cognitive strategy-specific increases in phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding protein and c-Fos in the hippocampus and dorsal striatum.

Authors:  Paul J Colombo; Jennifer J Brightwell; Renee A Countryman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Perirhinal cortex removal dissociates two memory systems in matching-to-sample performance in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Hsiao-Wei Tu; Robert R Hampton; Elisabeth A Murray
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Against memory systems.

Authors:  David Gaffan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Conditional routing of information to the cortex: a model of the basal ganglia's role in cognitive coordination.

Authors:  Andrea Stocco; Christian Lebiere; John R Anderson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Computational Models Inform Clinical Science and Assessment: An Application to Category Learning in Striatal-Damaged Patients.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; J Vincent Filoteo; Dagmar Zeithamova
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.223

6.  A Virtual Radial Arm Maze for the Study of Multiple Memory Systems in a Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Environment.

Authors:  Dongrong Xu; Xuejun Hao; Zhishun Wang; Yunsuo Duan; Feng Liu; Rachel Marsh; Shan Yu; Bradley S Peterson
Journal:  Int J Virtual Real       Date:  2012-06

Review 7.  How do the basal ganglia contribute to categorization? Their roles in generalization, response selection, and learning via feedback.

Authors:  Carol A Seger
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2007-08-12       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 8.  A scale-free systems theory of motivation and addiction.

Authors:  R Andrew Chambers; Warren K Bickel; Marc N Potenza
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Dissociating the contributions of independent corticostriatal systems to visual categorization learning through the use of reinforcement learning modeling and Granger causality modeling.

Authors:  Carol A Seger; Erik J Peterson; Corinna M Cincotta; Dan Lopez-Paniagua; Charles W Anderson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Brain reorganization, not relative brain size, primarily characterizes anthropoid brain evolution.

Authors:  J B Smaers; C Soligo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.